IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Finishing up the Video Codec document, MTI (again, still, sorry)

Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> Thu, 04 December 2014 23:16 UTC

Return-Path: <juberti@google.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B0A21A6FD1 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 15:16:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.388
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.388 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AZVowdfag-bV for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 15:16:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vc0-x236.google.com (mail-vc0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE61F1A6F0D for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 15:16:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id hq12so8206534vcb.41 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 15:16:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=by+pKuGy5zcNNW6wg8oC9BWP2qA241r1mlwU2RKaq1Q=; b=El743TJ9WzvAu+YhtWRlPkksjVde3btw67fdqh737RY/fhC0ImPuDAHJWr+UrIsHsG FcaFCojCtGRuCcSZChQq/iaRGaJKJo+PoXo8xCQEoC9WZhakXK9Zaz56Azp+sUIjnClw 6BpfB9gA4uHuEHxnDl0ie8A/2UIIRonYMTD3ltrCGfAe+WKyS3fHRrGj51j8dMRnZw63 vV67oAxITT4gxSysUybc82Bvto+DeqffKd/77/HXblupNIdyv4Tbm40wGr+reQgpgUCK 26+fwp49ihMjuc4BHYEiJvoTak+xAA+lnsDWzzGehj4ShxP9/WcxfRrXxZE7C+aX58ex 6mDg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=by+pKuGy5zcNNW6wg8oC9BWP2qA241r1mlwU2RKaq1Q=; b=FMilDHS1Rr7kR2V5zQtv0igSsgv6PC/HMo3E96MJ8cvaU2JJH8OhZ4hdh384PoWapC Nmplg0pDLAnxSgHf1mI9GtbTMq6fDxRGYF7fmsxhIe5qmsAx5qj/4O5Pz4hspG1qWcFh 0+kN4MTQ11ZbdLS4ZnXEQY5GFTxMpCgVu3/2yWAdFHBfVbHsPZrzo6H70/fIGV7kqKYz CcYCsf1heVvsJJQyPKcFlfP5G5/kwfVYFmBHc3xsfRdIGPvzzxDGSMtrwqKXnWyEIgOS iX3OpEx6T83T9vnlMeRzBAhGbBpDAn+NrTIOUnVdm9b4MlPux9fdRiBn1fqEXcrl+Dzc xtgQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlcbs+3EPhfEGmapzeCknSrZmqKF+G8065wG5C0tRyabXqbASoQ8KP7yD5jsjPJv8Z36Tuk
X-Received: by 10.52.117.161 with SMTP id kf1mr5590018vdb.65.1417734989875; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 15:16:29 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.237.130 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 15:16:09 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <32C6F602-6818-4A36-B18E-BF21774F6761@apple.com>
References: <547511DB.5050100@nostrum.com> <54759A4C.6020806@gmail.com> <5476092D.4010406@nostrum.com> <15EF2452-2C2C-420B-B972-C37EACE57850@apple.com> <CALiegfkbiN1BAaJyrqOzUeYiViCGHcs6QaM7VVHwUzCUVAuKBw@mail.gmail.com> <32C6F602-6818-4A36-B18E-BF21774F6761@apple.com>
From: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 15:16:09 -0800
Message-ID: <CAOJ7v-0xjNfht-39SL1tLETjdfW-RyRMC_2B4m77_x=OoiPPwg@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="bcaec547cbdd751f8d05096c2667"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/-kM2U4741bQWHg3RQBy5vUCrQ1w
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Finishing up the Video Codec document, MTI (again, still, sorry)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 23:16:32 -0000

On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 2:03 PM, David Singer <singer@apple.com> wrote:

>
> > On Dec 4, 2014, at 13:59 , Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> wrote:
> >
> > 2014-12-03 19:33 GMT+01:00 David Singer <singer@apple.com>:
> >> As I understand it, the recent face to face meeting decided to draft
> the requirement that WebRTC browsers be required to implement both VP8 and
> H.264, and get feedback on this, on the list.
> >>
> >> This is some feedback.
> >
> > I've been searching in both the rtcweb and public-webrtc mailing
> > lists, and must say that it is VERY SAD that the only "contribution"
> > and "feedback" received from Apple are these regarding "MTI codecs",
> > nothing else.
> >
> > I hope Apple has better things to do than sending FUD to working
> > groups in which they have no interest.
>
> I apologize for both the fact that you think this is FUD, and for the lack
> of other engagement.
>
> Quite where you see the uncertainty and doubt in the “you MUST implement
> something which, it is stated, is subject to IPR which CANNOT be licensed”,
> I am less sure.  Fear, yes, I get that.
>
>
I don't see others being deterred by the alleged uncertainty; there was
quite a broad consensus for this at IETF 91. But again, if this is a
particularly sensitive issue for your employer, I think there are many
potential solutions we can discuss.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email