[rtcweb] AD review: draft-ietf-rtcweb-ip-handling

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Fri, 02 November 2018 01:15 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B23F130DF2; Thu, 1 Nov 2018 18:15:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.88
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.88 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fbexW9gmqMxE; Thu, 1 Nov 2018 18:15:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D304130DE3; Thu, 1 Nov 2018 18:15:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Orochi.local ([38.98.37.141]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id wA21FHKU094512 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 1 Nov 2018 20:15:23 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [38.98.37.141] claimed to be Orochi.local
To: draft-ietf-rtcweb-ip-handling.all@ietf.org, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <773c8e91-a1d2-8c9e-fd19-c8b181f6dad1@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 20:15:12 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/-oQJucougPOsI9pNsCA_A9m9ng0>
Subject: [rtcweb] AD review: draft-ietf-rtcweb-ip-handling
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2018 01:15:34 -0000

This is my AD review for draft-ietf-rtcweb-ip-handling.

I think this document is ready to go into IETF last call, modulo the ICE
citation issue. I plan to issue last call for this document at the same time
as draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch and draft-ietf-rtcweb-security, so it 
will
wait for those to become ready.

I'm marking the document as "revised ID needed" pending the ICE reference
update.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[DISCUSS]

Per the discussion around Cluster 238 dependencies, please reference RFC 
8445
instead of RFC 5245.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

§2:

Please update to match the RFC 8174 boilerplate.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

§5.2:

 >  Future versions of this document may define additional modes and/or
 >  update the recommended default modes.

Suggest: "Future documents may...", as future consensus may be to update 
rather
than replace this document.