[rtcweb] AD review: draft-ietf-rtcweb-ip-handling

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Fri, 02 November 2018 01:15 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B23F130DF2; Thu, 1 Nov 2018 18:15:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.88
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.88 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fbexW9gmqMxE; Thu, 1 Nov 2018 18:15:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D304130DE3; Thu, 1 Nov 2018 18:15:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Orochi.local ([]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id wA21FHKU094512 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 1 Nov 2018 20:15:23 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [] claimed to be Orochi.local
To: draft-ietf-rtcweb-ip-handling.all@ietf.org, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <773c8e91-a1d2-8c9e-fd19-c8b181f6dad1@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 20:15:12 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/-oQJucougPOsI9pNsCA_A9m9ng0>
Subject: [rtcweb] AD review: draft-ietf-rtcweb-ip-handling
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2018 01:15:34 -0000

This is my AD review for draft-ietf-rtcweb-ip-handling.

I think this document is ready to go into IETF last call, modulo the ICE
citation issue. I plan to issue last call for this document at the same time
as draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch and draft-ietf-rtcweb-security, so it 
wait for those to become ready.

I'm marking the document as "revised ID needed" pending the ICE reference



Per the discussion around Cluster 238 dependencies, please reference RFC 
instead of RFC 5245.



Please update to match the RFC 8174 boilerplate.



 >  Future versions of this document may define additional modes and/or
 >  update the recommended default modes.

Suggest: "Future documents may...", as future consensus may be to update 
than replace this document.