Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus on Use Case for Screen/Application/Desktop sharing
Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> Tue, 20 September 2011 14:26 UTC
Return-Path: <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9470921F8C7E for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 07:26:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.517
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.517 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.082, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q0rq4uA1Irmo for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 07:26:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw10.se.ericsson.net (mailgw10.se.ericsson.net [193.180.251.61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A948821F8C77 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 07:26:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3d-b7c47ae000000b17-66-4e78a30df073
Received: from esessmw0184.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.115.81]) by mailgw10.se.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 44.B2.02839.D03A87E4; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:28:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (153.88.115.8) by esessmw0184.eemea.ericsson.se (153.88.115.82) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.3.137.0; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:28:20 +0200
Message-ID: <4E78A302.7030700@ericsson.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:28:18 +0200
From: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/6.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <4E76E8E8.2050102@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E76E8E8.2050102@ericsson.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus on Use Case for Screen/Application/Desktop sharing
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 14:26:05 -0000
I will conclude this call next week on Monday after a week. Based on the response rate already, I don't see much need for a longer time interval for the call. Cheers Magnus On 2011-09-19 09:02, Magnus Westerlund wrote: > WG, > > There where some discussion in the Interim meeting last week about a > Screen/Application/Desktop sharing support use case. My take away from > the discussion is that this use cases is likely well enough understood > to actually start a consensus call now. However, to us WG chairs it was > clear that the use case in question actually needs to be split into two > parts. > > A) Where the RTCWEB enabled browser can use a local application window, > the whole desktop or a Screen as a media source that can be encoded and > transported over the peerConnection for displaying/playback at the peer. > > B) Where a remote peer can provide one or more input types such as mouse > and keyboard to control the local system, not only including the > browser, but also other operating system resources. This clearly can > only happen after additional consent, most likely on a per occasion > consent. > > My interpretation is that A only allows for application sharing in > conferencing contexts, like in the WEBEX session the Interim meeting was > held with where we shared slides. Where the combination of A and B is > providing for VNC/Remote desktop. > > Thus the question to the WG is the following. > > 1) Do you support or object the inclusion of use case A, B or Both in > our Use case document? > > 2) Do you have additional comments for or against either of the use cases? > > > As WG chair > > Magnus Westerlund > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Ericsson AB | Phone +46 10 7148287 > Färögatan 6 | Mobile +46 73 0949079 > SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > _______________________________________________ > rtcweb mailing list > rtcweb@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb > -- Magnus Westerlund ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ericsson AB | Phone +46 10 7148287 Färögatan 6 | Mobile +46 73 0949079 SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com ----------------------------------------------------------------------
- [rtcweb] Call for Consensus on Use Case for Scree… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus on Use Case for S… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus on Use Case for S… Olle E. Johansson
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus on Use Case for S… Saúl Ibarra Corretgé
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus on Use Case for S… Olle E. Johansson
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus on Use Case for S… Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus on Use Case for S… Olle E. Johansson
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus on Use Case for S… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus on Use Case for S… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus on Use Case for S… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus on Use Case for S… Olle E. Johansson
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus on Use Case for S… Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus on Use Case for S… Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus on Use Case for S… Timothy B. Terriberry
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus on Use Case for S… Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus on Use Case for S… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus on Use Case for S… Emil Ivov
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus on Use Case for S… Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus on Use Case for S… Jim McEachern
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus on Use Case for S… Emil Ivov
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus on Use Case for S… Emil Ivov
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus on Use Case for S… Emil Ivov
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus on Use Case for S… Stefan Håkansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus on Use Case for S… Lorenzo Miniero
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus on Use Case for S… Cullen Jennings
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus on Use Case for S… Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus on Use Case for S… Stefan Håkansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] Sample implementation of screenshari… Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus on Use Case for S… Emil Ivov
- [rtcweb] Sample implementation of screensharing (… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus on Use Case for S… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus on Use Case for S… Emil Ivov
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus on Use Case for S… Stefan Håkansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus on Use Case for S… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus on Use Case for S… Stefan Håkansson LK