IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness

"Rauschenbach, Uwe (NSN - DE/Munich)" <uwe.rauschenbach@nsn.com> Mon, 25 August 2014 21:30 UTC

Return-Path: <uwe.rauschenbach@nsn.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28BFC1A039D for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 14:30:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wECDB5gHfK-N for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 14:30:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (demumfd001.nsn-inter.net [93.183.12.32]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 998CB1A039A for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 14:30:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demuprx017.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.56]) by demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id s7PLUGvo004684 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 25 Aug 2014 21:30:16 GMT
Received: from DEMUHTC004.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.42.35]) by demuprx017.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id s7PLUFsq012676 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 25 Aug 2014 23:30:15 +0200
Received: from DEMUHTC007.nsn-intra.net (10.159.42.38) by DEMUHTC004.nsn-intra.net (10.159.42.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 23:30:15 +0200
Received: from DEMUMBX005.nsn-intra.net ([169.254.5.128]) by DEMUHTC007.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.42.38]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 23:30:15 +0200
From: "Rauschenbach, Uwe (NSN - DE/Munich)" <uwe.rauschenbach@nsn.com>
To: ext Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness
Thread-Index: AQHPwFMXfQnqI/5MoEi+nAhfY9/EypvhIi6AgABMFACAAGib3A==
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 21:30:14 +0000
Message-ID: <56C2F665D49E0341B9DF5938005ACDF819485063@DEMUMBX005.nsn-intra.net>
References: <CA+9kkMCZT1XW4LLaJ4Nq2DbrxD59cYnjLo5JXn9fjEb8pyamaQ@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D41CDC3@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAKz0y8zycsyr9m4BA=-8xOaWkU+Sog5Mbz7K-oN3woqi++mVzg@mail.gmail.com> <53F451CF.10705@alvestrand.no> <001b01cfbc94$fccd5310$f667f930$@co.in> <CAKz0y8zNM3rc3XC6JqrK+d4hXiT5TomhNM+W2twg0+-83-pFow@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnUnfB5bskH4zWRfBMdHbSoqftV5Fo_GEXoLt9XCH9Tt_w@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxsT9Vdm0=tjk9WsLAH4ekbAizgyjm--168TrOf8UAYGZw@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnXUpibu8kWYmbJJJT2J3RNGXFV8LbceLijgG0U-pGY2xQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKz0y8z_oBf2efavfOLgzqE1R8sZstefZ1tvwwJLkhRskXZERQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxsSqA=cki_fSaqAPP0GXCv_kHr6571C+K9ze4ceHCGYdQ@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D427B68@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <D01D6B42.104F8%rmohanr@cisco.com> <009001cfbe4f$6b92f280$42b8d780$@co.in> <CAKz0y8y3=0_-jwWiviR_Uj6tSq75NEq92Ocergc_NvFk2h_72Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxugaPq=cLppPUqT8CUADV-E2zDMcz6m3sUgKOnK-TdQfQ@mail.gmail.com>, <CABkgnnU6kv+=jQuxj4Ci-zYW9mHEfJ=6jqqrdqDTopPN06-kgw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnU6kv+=jQuxj4Ci-zYW9mHEfJ=6jqqrdqDTopPN06-kgw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: de-DE
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_56C2F665D49E0341B9DF5938005ACDF819485063DEMUMBX005nsnin_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-purgate-type: clean
X-purgate-Ad: Categorized by eleven eXpurgate (R) http://www.eleven.de
X-purgate: clean
X-purgate: This mail is considered clean (visit http://www.eleven.de for further information)
X-purgate-size: 4500
X-purgate-ID: 151667::1409002216-0000061C-4C8F5F5F/0/0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/-rIRgUWOjTrsegPc0qjwp3gRa7M
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 21:30:21 -0000

I am not sure whether the -consent-freshness draft is the right place to require conformance to full ICE in order for something to be called a WebRTC endpoint. There are other drafts like -overview or -transport for this. The -consent-freshness draft should only make the link between implemented ICE flavor and implications for consent freshness support.

I therefore prefer Roman's proposal, but I am open to relaxing the MUST NOT.

Kind regards,
Uwe
________________________________
Von: ext Martin Thomson<mailto:martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Gesendet: ‎25.‎08.‎2014 19:16
An: Roman Shpount<mailto:roman@telurix.com>
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org<mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
Betreff: Re: [rtcweb] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness

On 25 August 2014 05:43, Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com> wrote:
> Any WebRTC entity implementing full ICE - MUST
> Any WebRTC entity (such as WebRTC gateway) implementing ICE-lite -- MUST NOT

Let's try this instead:

Any WebRTC entity MUST implement full ICE

Any entity performing full ICE MUST implement consent

Done.

_______________________________________________
rtcweb mailing list
rtcweb@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email