IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Some misunderstandings about <Usecase & architecture: Browser application with separate webserver & voipserver>

Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com> Thu, 25 August 2011 19:03 UTC

Return-Path: <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E156321F8834 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 12:03:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IDoCFBFwLMj7 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 12:03:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from blu0-omc3-s37.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc3-s37.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.116.112]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05AD721F87F9 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 12:03:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BLU152-W7 ([65.55.116.74]) by blu0-omc3-s37.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 25 Aug 2011 12:04:37 -0700
Message-ID: <BLU152-W72696F07F16816B1B267593100@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_2805f8cd-98e9-469a-8a84-9ed0147801ab_"
X-Originating-IP: [72.11.69.66]
From: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
To: pravindran@sonusnet.com, hoang.su.tk@gmail.com, rtcweb@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 12:04:37 -0700
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <2E239D6FCD033C4BAF15F386A979BF5106436F@sonusinmail02.sonusnet.com>
References: <CAM_kxqci51=BnUFe-67Qs4eCxtGY50HDsRPrLjYULnBZJoH0Ow@mail.gmail.com>, <2E239D6FCD033C4BAF15F386A979BF5106436F@sonusinmail02.sonusnet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Aug 2011 19:04:37.0702 (UTC) FILETIME=[D5CB6E60:01CC6359]
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Some misunderstandings about <Usecase & architecture: Browser application with separate webserver & voipserver>
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 19:03:29 -0000

> The issue in case webserver acts as new RTCWEB & SIP GW for VoIP
> communication, there is a need of protocol mapping between the protocol
> used between browser & RTCWebserver (say RTCweb protocol) to SIP.  [BA] Not necessarily.  For example, in the case of XMPP, BOSH can be usedto encapsulate XMPP over HTTP.  The BOSH Connection Manager/Web serverdoes not do "mapping", it just encapsulates/decapsulates XMPP stanzas, enabling communication between XMPP clients supporting BOSH and XMPP servers.   This be handled entirely in Javascript with no nativesupport for XMPP.  For detailed examples of how this works (with sample code), please see:http://professionalxmpp.com/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email