Re: [rtcweb] Mapping between SIP and ROAP/JSEP

Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> Thu, 10 May 2012 02:54 UTC

Return-Path: <juberti@google.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51A069E800B for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 May 2012 19:54:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.166
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.166 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.210, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_56=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BoSESSVLIlN5 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 May 2012 19:54:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-f44.google.com (mail-yw0-f44.google.com [209.85.213.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 943AF9E8006 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 May 2012 19:54:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by yhq56 with SMTP id 56so1224818yhq.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 09 May 2012 19:54:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:x-system-of-record; bh=x7D12QA14AxgJjr/i7yYnBCh9/Mw4S0/WCGiYOvEaYg=; b=fTvNv56kT/Fnw2OgPyNDq8FKWCaAK00tDgnun6N/9hxLatyP6QEpx7HtOgNF0N7i1d ov7dz4SftmNaZjQuO7y7RWIaNS23P+yGT9j8ffeVL8bQxrNHOj79KrSKcLymz/PexaLW lEXbtNLJuyJDgBiSvT/dSB1W6IM4E/vLEDZ+hWJoDGYkNsHkkv9aK5QDmKbAcI9uanCg UwjXgWN4oziPrlPCypdXF/gHtvEpxXl7S+yhgVzXMtdcFKrrBHnLw7goJ5J8Awyp/CHb k8dBquwaWnBg6lXX2/iR9UT+e+9ADFhv3MK+KBd1y/hup2aZuk01fwvAvH3/nLkWAAFv RvDg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:x-system-of-record:x-gm-message-state; bh=x7D12QA14AxgJjr/i7yYnBCh9/Mw4S0/WCGiYOvEaYg=; b=dQu+Vq57Os7EJsrdtj2nYRVTLc0BYRmU3F2yUFO8Hk2wxMSvsfM9oQLH42do0Vxifp U+gk1Fg8Vn4rcdLBjxSu6LHUqAChMV3yeZ4YTqDixtNV7ZYODBXXBaKl240V0GM5HY9k iytvRMY08lAxsuR+ZTMPY/71qpSiBG2n2J5I+RCRnVXetVhes2sOQbah8er1KkYb8Xk1 rUKGsP5YtdvNRIQbasHKyMspepCftkWcYGrwclggj2REuCQchcIdGIpmelmaOM+ln32H a1sGdFMzvSK9fN0c0Dj6I65pMaX7AeEzl17Q504W+zX2XAC4+hkebJWw4QgIaCrObJAZ ek6w==
Received: by 10.50.153.168 with SMTP id vh8mr2808185igb.16.1336618454987; Wed, 09 May 2012 19:54:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.50.153.168 with SMTP id vh8mr2808178igb.16.1336618454870; Wed, 09 May 2012 19:54:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.193.218 with HTTP; Wed, 9 May 2012 19:53:53 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <34966E97BE8AD64EAE9D3D6E4DEE36F2035816DE@szxeml525-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <1F2A2C70609D9E41844A2126145FC09804BCD25222@HKGMBOXPRD22.polycom.com> <34966E97BE8AD64EAE9D3D6E4DEE36F2035816DE@szxeml525-mbs.china.huawei.com>
From: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 22:53:53 -0400
Message-ID: <CAOJ7v-0MRgAccfp3MP4Y6HsCVOQyis-XeXHHX8i9DWw0kVc9Lw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Likepeng <likepeng@huawei.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f2357c733e8e604bfa5bc47
X-System-Of-Record: true
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmn3eaofKDtVHd9XcmlizxyLwJc6mUKQvAc/g2FKLXtTBbTYKwMSCDT4830rx/JmLPCmDGH0qZKAYLYcCDaDDpLiAy3L7+DJqq0xPMkxE3sRGCNm62nHocOVi3f3Z7IKwQG2Sw+
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Mapping between SIP and ROAP/JSEP
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 02:54:16 -0000

I would be willing to review a JSEP-XMPP draft.

On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 4:18 AM, Likepeng <likepeng@huawei.com> wrote:

>  I think it is useful to have such a draft which provides a mapping
> between SIP and ROAP/JSEP protocols.****
>
> ** **
>
> Previously Cullen has an expired draft related to this:****
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jennings-rtcweb-signaling-gateway-00****
>
> ** **
>
> Some time ago, I submitted a draft to map ROAP with XMPP/Jingle.****
>
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-rtcweb-roap-jingle-interworking/*
> ***
>
> ** **
>
> I need to update it to reflect the JSEP concept.****
>
> ** **
>
> I would appreciate if anybody has interest to work with me about this.****
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks,****
>
> Kind Regards****
>
> Kepeng****
>
> *发件人:* rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] *代表 *Avasarala,
> Ranjit
> *发送时间:* 2012年5月9日 14:49
> *收件人:* rtcweb@ietf.org
> *主题:* [rtcweb] Mapping between SIP and ROAP/JSEP****
>
> ** **
>
> Hi****
>
> ** **
>
> Is there any interest in the coming up with a mapping between SIP and
> ROAP/JSEP protocols?  Though JSEP is a set of APIs as of now which map
> closely with ROAP APIs, ROAP has messages like OFFER,ANSWER and OK which
> can be mapped to SIP.****
>
> ** **
>
> Comment?****
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks****
>
> ** **
>
> Regards****
>
> Ranjit****
>
> ** **
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>
>