IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus on Use Case for Screen/Application/Desktop sharing

Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan@acmepacket.com> Tue, 20 September 2011 01:21 UTC

Return-Path: <HKaplan@acmepacket.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23BD021F8B03 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 18:21:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.517
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.517 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.082, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L15AZX7F0-Mx for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 18:21:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from etmail.acmepacket.com (etmail.acmepacket.com [216.41.24.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53A9221F8AFF for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 18:21:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MAIL2.acmepacket.com (10.0.0.22) by etmail.acmepacket.com (216.41.24.6) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.254.0; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 21:23:19 -0400
Received: from MAIL1.acmepacket.com ([169.254.1.150]) by Mail2.acmepacket.com ([169.254.2.157]) with mapi id 14.01.0270.001; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 21:23:19 -0400
From: Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan@acmepacket.com>
To: Randell Jesup <randell-ietf@jesup.org>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus on Use Case for Screen/Application/Desktop sharing
Thread-Index: AQHMdzPds7ADiC0xR0Si0yam86wrPw==
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 01:23:12 +0000
Message-ID: <0113846C-765C-43D1-80EA-A9F9D8943989@acmepacket.com>
References: <4E76E8E8.2050102@ericsson.com> <017078EC-3E1A-4CC4-A29F-51B569474416@acmepacket.com> <4E774B34.1090605@jesup.org>
In-Reply-To: <4E774B34.1090605@jesup.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [216.41.24.34]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <84B9A1CE3B9F7B44B287456839A5C1B4@acmepacket.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAWE=
Cc: "<rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus on Use Case for Screen/Application/Desktop sharing
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 01:21:02 -0000

On Sep 19, 2011, at 10:01 AM, Randell Jesup wrote:

> BTW, your IT department does know that Windows has Remote Desktop and Remote Assistance,
> right?  ;-)

Yup, and I don't know what they think of that.  My guess is they're ok with RDP because it's a separate well-known TCP listen port number they can block in the firewalls, and afaik doesn't work behind NATs (when the server is behind a NAT) unless you create static port maps.  And RA requires a separate permissions password for the session, I think.

-hadriel

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email