IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Some language on "prioritization"

"Karl Stahl" <karl.stahl@intertex.se> Thu, 10 April 2014 15:34 UTC

Return-Path: <karl.stahl@intertex.se>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CE221A01DC for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 08:34:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.8
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, MSGID_MULTIPLE_AT=1] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L7XW-zye5-bA for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 08:34:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.it-norr.com (smtp.it-norr.com [80.244.64.163]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B35911A0073 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 08:34:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ([90.229.134.75]) by smtp.it-norr.com (Telecom3 SMTP service) with ASMTP id 201404101734244210; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 17:34:24 +0200
From: Karl Stahl <karl.stahl@intertex.se>
To: 'Paul Kyzivat' <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>, rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <5339A120.3040909@alvestrand.no> <CABkgnnVUHUx+3wY3Dsi=UvNkUw_Es1apeMSonq7DtEg_3UKRNg@mail.gmail.com> <FBA84C78-FE8E-4FEF-8AD3-CAF24C57E512@lurchi.franken.de>, <5339AA58.9070301@alvestrand.no> <834D5209-5EEA-4001-B8ED-3835FC4D05FB@skype.net> <00af01cf4f59$fa617b90$ef2472b0$@stahl@intertex.se> <5346B28E.60408@alum.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <5346B28E.60408@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 17:34:32 +0200
Message-ID: <00aa01cf54d2$5eb1a700$1c14f500$@stahl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: Ac9UzfajHns3jfI1RYG+yRhxnFwVhQAA8xhw
Content-Language: sv
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/0B4KyYkVk6UYzzJv4zZA1QLupjs
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Some language on "prioritization"
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 15:34:31 -0000

-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Från: rtcweb [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] För Paul Kyzivat
Skickat: den 10 april 2014 17:03
Till: rtcweb@ietf.org
Ämne: Re: [rtcweb] Some language on "prioritization"

On 4/3/14 12:30 PM, Karl Stahl wrote:

> (B) Each rtcweb file transfer MUST use its own data channel (if 
> combined they risk being regulated randomly/unfairly by SCTP itself 
> and all files will have just have one single TCP-like flow at the 
> network congestion point when sharing the available bandwidth with 
> everyone else's flows at that congestion point - That would be 
> "negative priority" compared to what we are used to in a browser.).

I presume you mean each *concurrent* file transfer must use its own channel.
Right? Reusing the same channel to transfer a series of files should be
fine.

	Thanks,
	Paul
Yes, That is right. /Karl
_______________________________________________
rtcweb mailing list
rtcweb@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status