[rtcweb] Interim meeting and way forward

Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com> Tue, 12 February 2013 11:45 UTC

Return-Path: <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DC0821F8D12; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 03:45:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.186
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.186 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.063, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g22iBF8FRQmC; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 03:45:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailgw2.ericsson.se (mailgw2.ericsson.se [193.180.251.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7BD821F8D0B; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 03:45:05 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb25-b7f366d000004d10-09-511a2b40cc22
Received: from esessmw0237.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by mailgw2.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 68.5A.19728.04B2A115; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 12:45:04 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [131.160.36.86] (153.88.115.8) by esessmw0237.eemea.ericsson.se (153.88.115.91) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.3.279.1; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 12:45:04 +0100
Message-ID: <511A2B40.2030408@ericsson.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 13:45:04 +0200
From: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtcweb@ietf.org, mmusic <mmusic@ietf.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrBJMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvja6DtlSgwfX1lhZTlz9msVj7r53d gcljyZKfTAGMUVw2Kak5mWWpRfp2CVwZh69uZy2Ywlcx695z5gbGzdxdjJwcEgImEvPnLGKC sMUkLtxbz9bFyMUhJHCSUeJ6QyeUs5pRYsKRN6wgVbwC2hK3Lp1mA7FZBFQltj6fwg5iswlY SGy5dZ8FxBYViJJ4f7WJGaJeUOLkzCdgcREBXYkDmx6D2cICGhIvvk9ig9gsKbFoWidYnFlA T2LK1RZGCFteYvvbOWBzhID2Ln/WwjKBkX8WkrGzkLTMQtKygJF5FSN7bmJmTnq50SZGYGgd 3PJbdQfjnXMihxilOViUxHnDXS8ECAmkJ5akZqemFqQWxReV5qQWH2Jk4uCUamCcVbDFk2vR /mV+aUs2XkubZRj5i8l77+GjJ2/rTzN+LXzPetGcXxFGZyN6Tj37t3GaoM3fZPUt377I7boc IJG+N9Pq+Ioy94T+lRbdbK17HkhL8qeff3bONpPdg3OT/ZPFLXGbVjdHsYmm93Ff/ybmO+/X au9s7h9sAYFNn+7JRv33k/nAdDxJiaU4I9FQi7moOBEAG85bB/sBAAA=
Subject: [rtcweb] Interim meeting and way forward
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 11:45:07 -0000

Folks,

first of all, I hope everybody has already managed to get back home
after the storm. Also, I want to thank Hadriel and Acme for being great
hosts. The information flow, the meeting facilities, the catering, the
pullovers, and everything else was just perfect.

With respect to the technical work that got done in Boston and, more
importantly, that remains to be done, I want to share a few thoughts
with the group.

A fact that is obvious but some of us sometimes forget about is that
RTCWeb, as any other technology, has a window of opportunity. The
usefulness and relevance of any standards we develop in this area will
be extremely high within that window, but will decrease dramatically if
the window closes (e.g., if too many new applications out there are
based on non-standard mechanisms).

While we have everything in the group to meet the relevant market's
deadlines, we should keep them in mind nevertheless. In particular, we
are going to be facing cases where *any* decision is better than *no*
decision, or where the *perfect* will be the enemy of the *good*.

In practical terms, the group should think twice before opening
already-made decisions and open them only for very good reasons. Also,
the group is going to have to make decisions based on *rough* consensus,
as opposed to *wide* consensus or unanimity. This may sound like
motherhood and apple pie but I want to stress these points anyway since
they are important and need to be kept in mind.

For Orlando, I have allocated a *significant* amount of time to RTCWeb
and MMUSIC. Those sessions will allow us to take advantage of the
momentum we currently have after the interim and to make more progress
in all the relevant specifications.

Cheers,

Gonzalo
AD for the RTCWeb and MMUSIC WGs