Re: [rtcweb] revisiting MTI

Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net> Mon, 15 December 2014 22:24 UTC

Return-Path: <peter@andyet.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 243461A19FA for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 14:24:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F4yH9YBUVVq9 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 14:24:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ig0-f181.google.com (mail-ig0-f181.google.com [209.85.213.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC0A31A047A for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 14:24:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ig0-f181.google.com with SMTP id l13so6410055iga.8 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 14:24:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=6yqluzpdULDuqcBrB49XnFCIIlfnbd2qaQwaflEHsZM=; b=YDFEUctxqPbb4WHJoQ7RW7a3Khv6uHxVrYB5UW4B1Rl4hF3VoygEIr9gmEFEQVa7IX xEu6xtV1d5+8S6Iu21vv6IJIkF56pVzHH5k0rpjmR9Z+E79cWAMs0NJMb4w1p4knQzRu fMovqG+W1uQ/OfgNW2sjqilu3ptlxlgTuMLafnhbi27KN9Ni0+8c019D7znkfLb7aGiv 1fn3K3rS8i6QwrFao33Ns309yZoBpwXPnZflT+VQ6dyIOudYXaH/4PmrQGrkMdU7rxJ8 3tkFf69rI66zYpXP5FwWdRCsNLlvxqhh+qT0BNVTro5OF4LpYiMlezqPqgdIQVuSON9y SKeQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlS7YsZCPc8k0IyKc45ucGS00hPZBUWeWUA0oygjGlW1Fyvdt0JGSdNPn4ZEIIpFDR1FZCL
X-Received: by 10.50.55.65 with SMTP id q1mr20165223igp.17.1418682297172; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 14:24:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aither.local (c-73-34-202-214.hsd1.co.comcast.net. [73.34.202.214]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id q7sm5508718igx.9.2014.12.15.14.24.55 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 15 Dec 2014 14:24:56 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <548F5FB8.9010300@andyet.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 15:24:56 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <548AFB1A.1040405@andyet.net> <548AFF76.1010003@nostrum.com> <CALiegfmH6hWp6nuArv8YyPcgq6SCd9x-dU0cxAaKJLrmb0hc_g@mail.gmail.com> <548B047F.9090704@nostrum.com> <56448CBD-FB31-4468-B449-497652FCAAEB@apple.com> <548B7EFF.5080105@andyet.net> <CALiegfkMUzQVOKk433d4TZtvenQWQwChYF2vc7HMED2s2wHZ5Q@mail.gmail.com> <B52D8E91-5D96-4960-8DDE-DD970014DE5D@ieca.com> <CALiegfnRvgDK4EnDBSn76YKktWLMjShsQRP6byCRqZC07WaVqw@mail.gmail.com> <548F0E28.8040503@andyet.net> <20141215192409.GN47023@verdi> <548F54A5.2060105@andyet.net> <CA+9kkMDNhRdbzCs9vrqDeD4CoWWK1xS5o0z3jL0DvNpDuLfCPw@mail.gmail.com> <548F5E22.2040605@andyet.net> <548F5F0E.4050100@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <548F5F0E.4050100@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/0Ij49BWAZnWRm95811NQeQr0QOQ
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] revisiting MTI
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 22:24:59 -0000

On 12/15/14, 3:22 PM, Adam Roach wrote:
> On 12/15/14 16:18, Peter Saint-Andre - &yet wrote:
>> Some folks have expressed a concern that whatever we choose as an MTI
>> codec now must always be an MTI codec. I'm trying to allay that
>> concern by saying that yes, indeed, we can change our MTI codec(s) in
>> the future if we please (naturally, keeping interoperability in mind
>> at that future time).
>
> I agree 100%, but I don't think we need to get consensus on what this
> effort might look like 10 years in the future. Let's leave tomorrow's
> battles for tomorrow, or we'll never make progress.

Yes, that's why I'm now saying to leave out all future-oriented text. 
Those who want to influence better MTI decisions in the future can get 
involved with building better codecs today. :-)

Peter