Return-Path: <suhasietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
 with ESMTP id 4033D21F8703; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:53:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id usXUVyUpH+fm;
 Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:53:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wg0-f49.google.com (mail-wg0-f49.google.com
 [74.125.82.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC9DB21F86E7;
 Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:53:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id 15so6787965wgd.4 for
 <multiple recipients>; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:53:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
 :subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
 bh=TcRFn7X5MSpfa734lqgj/VeAuk3b5e3m17imDedIsiM=;
 b=Ga9+ebzSghrYcw4YfI+ihcdKMjtlKMxO78MI7rrO/ghmoE/q7XNnd5j70QiEXHrnHK
 NnQ3LTQqCFoZh8JxODQreDFa44WWuMHG5LbHrn3Ty9kTeCQkyvIcXbaAdz2MIs4raNVb
 U8a0UsA+PkiGXLIF+tG+B/+ftsWT7EO2m9rsNon/2xcLcxrWxjlWPTeT25SgJp6OxA51
 csiZ+AWLjlsNwK9a22wwCfaWcsYiQWOZyoAuf8xhpb7fmU2L1/YbMlJUHUduc3cGKukC
 LSBBa3w76E/st4HXpQA8WvZLXR6K00sIfYMUEyllc+Q9xPiFHpfh0wAkCifM3kFN9ftb qrgA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.59.40 with SMTP id w8mr37287835wjq.51.1361408007639;
 Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:53:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.194.44.99 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:53:27 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBMg0AdhFj61S1hgz9WCP2JikLabrm3dAA36hyb99_93Sg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABcZeBMg0AdhFj61S1hgz9WCP2JikLabrm3dAA36hyb99_93Sg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:53:27 -0800
Message-ID: <CAMRcRGSEkO0pj_i6Vzf6cpay0AhkzAwaGwQn3AbQndW1sUXscw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b86d68cb0cd2204d631801d
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org, mmusic WG <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Agenda For WG Meetings
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list
 <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>,
 <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>,
 <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 00:53:30 -0000

--047d7b86d68cb0cd2204d631801d
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

+1

Looks Neat !!

./Suhas

On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:

> In the tradition of the Interim, I tried to sit down and work out an
> agenda that reflects that I think the important concerns are, namely:
>
> - Video codecs (as promised)
> - Multiplexing of media flows
> - Trickle ICE
> - DataChannels
>
> Two notes about cross-WG interaction:
>
> - I'm assuming that most of the MMUSIC time will be used for
>   RTCWEB-type stuff, though I left 30 min for other MMUSIC
>   business on Tue.
>
> - I don't know how much time AVTEXT needs given the AVTEXT/
>   MMUSIC merger on Fri. We can reduce the draft-jennings-rtcweb-plan
>   time accordingly based on agenda requests.
>
> Hope this is useful. I'm of course happy to get on a call to discuss
> this if that helps.
>
> -Ekr
>
>
> RTCWEB I: Tuesday 0900-1130
> 0900 - 0905  Administrivia
> 0905 - 1100  Video Codec MTI discussion
>   - draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-vp8-00 (30 mins)
>   -
> draft-burman-rtcweb-h264-proposal-00+draft-dbenham-webrtcvideomti-00+draft-marjou-rtcweb-video-codec-00
> (30 mins)
>   - General discussion 30 min)
>   - Call the question of which mandatory to implement video codec to
> select (5 min)
>   - Next steps (20 min)
>  1100 - 1115  draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements (LC comments)
>  1115 - 1130  draft-ietf-draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview (LC comments)
>
>
> MMUSIC I: Tuesday 1520-1830
> 1520 - 1525  Administrivia
> 1525 - 1605  Trickle ICE (Ivov)
> - Under what conditions can you do full trickle (discovery)
> - When can checking stop? [UPDATE vs. in-band vs...?]
> - SDP/SIP encoding for additional trickle candidates
> 1605 - 1650  - Bundle
>  - draft-ejzak-mmusic-bundle-alternatives (15 min)
>  - draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation (15 min)
>  - discussion/consensus calls (15 min)
> 1650 - 1700  [Break]
> 1700 - 1800  SDP attribute analysis for multiplexing
>  - draft-nandakumar-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes
> 1800 - 1830  [Other MMUSIC business]
>
>
> RTCWEB II: Thursday 0900-1130
> 0900 - 0905  Administrivia
> 0905 - 1025  Data Channel negotiation
>  - draft-jesup-rtcweb-data-protocol (15 min)
>  - draft-thomson-rtcweb-data (15 min)
>  - draft-marcon-rtcweb-data-channel-management (15 min)
>  - Discussion (30 min)
>  - Consensus call (5 min)
> 1025 - 1100 JSEP Update (Uberti)
>  - draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep
> 1100 - 1115  RTCP-XR (Westerlund)
> 1115 - 1130  RTP Concepts and relation
> - daft-burman-rtcweb-mmusic-media-structure
>
>
> MMUSIC II: Friday 0900-1100
> 0900 - 0905  Administrivia
> 0905 - 0925  Requirements (draft-jennings-mmusic-media-req)
> 0925 - 1015  PC-track to m-line mapping (draft-jennings-rtcweb-plan)
> 1015 - 1100  MSID changes to match multiplexing
> (draft-jennings-rtcweb-plan)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>
>

--047d7b86d68cb0cd2204d631801d
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

+1 <br><br>Looks Neat !!<br><br>./Suhas<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">O=
n Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Eric Rescorla <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=
=3D"mailto:ekr@rtfm.com" target=3D"_blank">ekr@rtfm.com</a>&gt;</span> wrot=
e:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div>In the tradition of the Interim, I trie=
d to sit down and work out an</div><div>agenda that reflects that I think t=
he important concerns are, namely:</div>
<div><br></div><div>- Video codecs (as promised)</div><div>- Multiplexing o=
f media flows</div>

<div>- Trickle ICE</div><div>- DataChannels</div><div><br></div><div>Two no=
tes about cross-WG interaction:</div><div><br></div><div>- I&#39;m assuming=
 that most of the MMUSIC time will be used for</div><div>=A0 RTCWEB-type st=
uff, though I left 30 min for other MMUSIC</div>


<div>=A0 business on Tue.</div><div><br></div><div>- I don&#39;t know how m=
uch time AVTEXT needs given the AVTEXT/</div><div>=A0 MMUSIC merger on Fri.=
 We can reduce the draft-jennings-rtcweb-plan</div><div>=A0 time accordingl=
y based on agenda requests.</div>


<div><br></div><div>Hope this is useful. I&#39;m of course happy to get on =
a call to discuss</div><div>this if that helps.</div><div><br></div><div>-E=
kr</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>RTCWEB I: Tuesday 0900-1130</div=
>


<div>0900 - 0905 =A0Administrivia</div><div>0905 - 1100 =A0Video Codec MTI =
discussion</div><div>=A0 - draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-vp8-00 (30 mins)</div><d=
iv>=A0 - draft-burman-rtcweb-h264-proposal-00+draft-dbenham-webrtcvideomti-=
00+draft-marjou-rtcweb-video-codec-00 (30 mins)</div>


<div>=A0 - General discussion 30 min)</div><div>=A0 - Call the question of =
which mandatory to implement video codec to select (5 min)</div><div>=A0 - =
Next steps (20 min)</div><div>=A01100 - 1115 =A0draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases=
-and-requirements (LC comments)</div>


<div>=A01115 - 1130 =A0draft-ietf-draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview (LC comments)<=
/div><div>=A0 =A0=A0</div><div><br></div><div>MMUSIC I: Tuesday 1520-1830</=
div><div>1520 - 1525 =A0Administrivia</div><div>1525 - 1605 =A0Trickle ICE =
(Ivov)</div>


<div>- Under what conditions can you do full trickle (discovery)</div><div>=
- When can checking stop? [UPDATE vs. in-band vs...?]</div><div>- SDP/SIP e=
ncoding for additional trickle candidates</div><div>1605 - 1650 =A0- Bundle=
=A0</div>


<div>=A0- draft-ejzak-mmusic-bundle-alternatives (15 min)</div><div>=A0- dr=
aft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation (15 min)</div><div>=A0- discussion/c=
onsensus calls (15 min)</div><div>1650 - 1700 =A0[Break]</div><div>1700 - 1=
800 =A0SDP attribute analysis for multiplexing</div>


<div>=A0- draft-nandakumar-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes</div><div>1800 - 1830 =
=A0[Other MMUSIC business]</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>RTCWEB I=
I: Thursday 0900-1130</div><div>0900 - 0905 =A0Administrivia</div><div>0905=
 - 1025 =A0Data Channel negotiation</div>


<div>=A0- draft-jesup-rtcweb-data-protocol (15 min)</div><div>=A0- draft-th=
omson-rtcweb-data (15 min)</div><div>=A0- draft-marcon-rtcweb-data-channel-=
management (15 min)</div><div>=A0- Discussion (30 min)</div><div>=A0- Conse=
nsus call (5 min)</div>


<div>1025 - 1100 JSEP Update (Uberti)</div><div>=A0- draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep=
</div><div>1100 - 1115 =A0RTCP-XR (Westerlund)</div><div>1115 - 1130 =A0RTP=
 Concepts and relation</div><div>- daft-burman-rtcweb-mmusic-media-structur=
e</div>


<div><br></div><div><br></div><div>MMUSIC II: Friday 0900-1100</div><div>09=
00 - 0905 =A0Administrivia</div><div>0905 - 0925 =A0Requirements (draft-jen=
nings-mmusic-media-req)</div><div>0925 - 1015 =A0PC-track to m-line mapping=
 (draft-jennings-rtcweb-plan)</div>


<div>1015 - 1100 =A0MSID changes to match multiplexing (draft-jennings-rtcw=
eb-plan)</div><div><br></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
rtcweb mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org">rtcweb@ietf.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb" target=3D"_blank">=
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>

--047d7b86d68cb0cd2204d631801d--