Re: [rtcweb] Plan for MTI video codec?

Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com> Wed, 15 October 2014 18:39 UTC

Return-Path: <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18B551A90D3 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 11:39:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id muSo3eoPAYxp for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 11:39:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-x233.google.com (mail-wg0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A3EC1A90CC for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 11:39:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f51.google.com with SMTP id b13so2041930wgh.10 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 11:39:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=xXBCH5fbT6jRHiASmQXABOlAmx3Or20wxHG5KI42jCA=; b=FoORyq/ndaavo95rMVMgpPGcFyFs6/gkDRh909AL3Btjpq+tg2PqBhSb7ez19OEx7J sbPknhtxFQZZHlAPhuUOoCbUXfzqWz4IKm1l/WVFL0A9kCrRaNTEkHBCr67IzqWwOCh9 6ZHnJO6gOLdQr2L4K+JqlJvNVtN8c+2bQRxVYEuBDiVDtX3miYOMpMlRy8fJiprydtLF NrC/zFSKJH3Lz0VuAfDotFMnIWHjXOfFknP+OgJJvD95MiFsBdADg6SclrkynXAC89bP lxd2fEfGndqW0hRo25rU1fv0zFPEfc8zDzezsWs8wRx+pOHUpEhBYDAJahhH4b61T/k4 GdvA==
X-Received: by 10.194.103.74 with SMTP id fu10mr14953427wjb.0.1413398393140; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 11:39:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.217.134.196 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 11:39:31 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMAZufR7gUrwkS7Tf5GOfg+ZtsZWGcn-8YLCvnmYnTgfFw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGTXFp-HVJDwd86207PNM2QVYO4Z_K4WF-KarnRs1fb7nvy4zA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMDfES8gpi0-PTXpCnQHjFYUSF2r44TNzH5B4UfDGo8PtA@mail.gmail.com> <CAGTXFp8O-7ACksk3v3f=KjCkcDb4e8G=t-e=EJ1503vt7TkpCQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAGTXFp867AMUZ_fEKxG9uAoR1H1AirVHi3-ayJ=KTQk9L+C7+g@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMAZufR7gUrwkS7Tf5GOfg+ZtsZWGcn-8YLCvnmYnTgfFw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 11:39:31 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOW+2dtMCkFLVxAvwGHN5Sgb0d+0CJrLrmt2u96LONLisY1qyA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e010d7fb826414f05057a75bb
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/0K8WvYYl6m-scB8loiPQjVrBduk
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Plan for MTI video codec?
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 18:39:58 -0000

Are we actually going to spend time discussing draft-ietf-rtcweb-video
(which will provide the details on what is necessary for video
implementations of any codec), or will yet another MTI discussion take up
all the energy (and perhaps time)?


On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Victor,
>
> As you may remember, we tabled discussion of video codecs back in January,
> and said that the topic could be re-opened 6 weeks prior to IETF 91.  We do
> anticipate discussing it at this meeting, likely in the Thursday slot
> (since there is a related BoF earlier that day).
>
> regards,
>
> Ted Hardie
>
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 7:20 AM, Victor Pascual Avila <
> victor.pascual.avila@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I surely missed a recent thread on it but, any plan to discuss MTI
>> Video Codec in HI?
>>
>> I read in Jonathan's post it's part of the agenda?
>> http://blogs.cisco.com/collaboration/ciscos-openh264-now-part-of-firefox/
>>
>> Cheers,
>> -Victor
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Victor Pascual Avila
>> <victor.pascual.avila@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Thanks for the feedback Ted!
>> >
>> > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 7:48 PM, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Hi Victor,
>> >>
>> >> The chairs have been discussion the structure of the upcoming meeting,
>> and
>> >> you should expect something from us soon.
>> >>
>> >> thanks,
>> >>
>> >> Ted
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 6:47 AM, Victor Pascual Avila
>> >> <victor.pascual.avila@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Dear WG Chairs,
>> >>>
>> >>> What's the plan for the MTI video codec discussion? Are we planning to
>> >>> discuss this during our next meeting? Is there a reason to delay this
>> >>> decision?
>> >>>
>> >>> My apologies if this has already been discussed but could not find it
>> >>> in the archives.
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks,
>> >>> -Victor
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> rtcweb mailing list
>> >>> rtcweb@ietf.org
>> >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Victor Pascual Ávila
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Victor Pascual Ávila
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtcweb mailing list
>> rtcweb@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>
>