Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda RTCWeb call on September 8th

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 30 August 2011 22:01 UTC

Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 090C621F8BCD for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:01:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D1I80pLNRsdH for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:01:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qw0-f44.google.com (mail-qw0-f44.google.com [209.85.216.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E795621F8C00 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:01:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qwc23 with SMTP id 23so95090qwc.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:02:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=gRgATu98XN9FHu0MlGDOkbj5bQRzmPnes6wisycGQCo=; b=pgCs43PH3Ax/zS60u51Ldd+gr7Hm63PzFk6bCsM8wt0Ywmupl8qe/xgBhiaqwf/A5Z 5apIAyU6I3RiSR0yID2k73RwgiIsxw2/g9tyLqAapITk+cyNiFdDiUGH6/Z/Tp44jQlp satIy7ZoAy0CMIuSd4YsL9q03Loy0hTdxHMOM=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.63.166 with SMTP id b38mr7417630qci.32.1314741761183; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:02:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.43.220 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:02:40 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <823F7443-56D2-4976-A549-1AFFD85AB2A6@csperkins.org>
References: <9EB9B0D0-8C3A-433D-9416-5A824F44BEED@cisco.com> <4E5B5FCD.2000708@alvestrand.no> <823F7443-56D2-4976-A549-1AFFD85AB2A6@csperkins.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:02:40 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMDHXEE6h0eOdG28GdZN9rhgF4kMLg0OyevEErJ53oThcg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda RTCWeb call on September 8th
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 22:01:15 -0000

To clarify a bit further on what we're thinking for next week's
agenda, the chairs are currently thinking of this time split:

1 Hour:  Use case discussion (draft available now)

1 Hour:  Security (draft available end of the week)
--Focus of the discussion will be on what we want to provide as
assurances to different actors.

1 Hour: Signaling
--Focus of the discussion will be semantics & path (e.g Offer/Answer or
alternative?)

1/2 Hour: RTP concepts mapping to WebRTC API objects
--How  flows/streams/sessions map to tracks/connections/tracklists

1/2 Hour: Tentative slot for Congestion Control

Please send any agenda discussion to the as soon as possible, so
folks are prepping for the right things.

thanks,

Ted, Cullen, Magnus