IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] realiable data service

Dzonatas Sol <dzonatas@gmail.com> Tue, 19 July 2011 23:23 UTC

Return-Path: <dzonatas@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDC4711E808B for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 16:23:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.317
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.317 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.718, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5Nq1S1Mxf3NX for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 16:23:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iw0-f172.google.com (mail-iw0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16857228012 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 16:23:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iwn39 with SMTP id 39so4887422iwn.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 16:23:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YLxjZaZ2F9teI2qtn4HfYKtQBhHDfyV0Oe9o4H1ZU7M=; b=myNITnBWjABWk1eqs+GR1EvvV/OPu0rw7pNoO+f+WYBkwbDNSl4kEtk9LsqgcRBeMT ZQ7mRwN8PnvYpFVQ2rHnMQRPWTI7Td3dkoB5Uxklv90Ce7sOeyTfncwS4PGxZN5icmGN iUb71hTQRyZlyrrSAnaUDBjJge07U5Ld2HvG0=
Received: by 10.231.112.150 with SMTP id w22mr7581012ibp.61.1311117790553; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 16:23:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.50] ([70.133.70.225]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c2sm3912222ibd.22.2011.07.19.16.23.08 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 19 Jul 2011 16:23:09 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4E2611E4.2070300@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 16:23:16 -0700
From: Dzonatas Sol <dzonatas@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20110505 Icedove/3.0.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <CAMKM2LzpVcS9jjXjfffuXy+YQmjZXbdaSJBp+O22nLd4N2KAvg@mail.gmail.com> <CA4AFBFA.1C4B5%henry.sinnreich@gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-3R0PeUSdVZ0n7AE08J=UjYMJqJ+4-Vkbj7w0qs0u=Rgw@mail.gmail.com> <4E25B2BA.8000004@jesup.org>
In-Reply-To: <4E25B2BA.8000004@jesup.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] realiable data service
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 23:23:11 -0000

On 07/19/2011 09:37 AM, Randell Jesup wrote:
>
> To your point, another way this effort could fail is by biting off too 
> much or taking too long to
> converge, which is a real danger.  That's one reason to leverage 
> existing protocols.
>

Baby-safe is what I keep in mind every day. I'm not perfectr, neither is 
danger.

Maybe some systems want optimizational values out of their protocols 
because they see no need for the consumption of computational energy. 
All the riches, what the world want at even given moment. Practical reality.


-- 
--- http://twitter.com/Dzonatas_Sol ---
Web Development, Software Engineering
Ag-Biotech, Virtual Reality, Consultant

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email