Re: [rtcweb] Consensus Call: RTCWeb Terminology

Ralph Giles <giles@thaumas.net> Wed, 26 October 2011 17:33 UTC

Return-Path: <giles@thaumas.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 318D611E8085 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 10:33:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F+aCh26c3L+f for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 10:33:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vx0-f172.google.com (mail-vx0-f172.google.com [209.85.220.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EBA71F0C3C for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 10:33:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vcbfo1 with SMTP id fo1so1998317vcb.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 10:33:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.187.139 with SMTP id cw11mr450448vcb.67.1319650436725; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 10:33:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.192.8 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 10:33:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [184.71.166.126]
In-Reply-To: <DD0E14D2-252F-442B-9AFC-8ECD6704794B@cisco.com>
References: <AAB480AA-8F03-4C25-8A7C-55B88D057C24@acmepacket.com> <42322A10-14A7-4600-820D-7612A1B12592@cisco.com> <3747C7CB-C039-4D15-A46C-8FDB9A47AF3A@acmepacket.com> <DD0E14D2-252F-442B-9AFC-8ECD6704794B@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 10:33:56 -0700
Message-ID: <CAEW_Rku9ZVzDHo41Oi3Lb1MN2XpMhnBDsDQ=3EYppAngiPmfEA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ralph Giles <giles@thaumas.net>
To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Consensus Call: RTCWeb Terminology
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 17:33:58 -0000

On 26 October 2011 10:17, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com> wrote:

> I'd like to declare we currently have consensus for Hadriel's proposal that the technology should be referred to as "WebRTC" and the API as the "WebRTC API". The IETF WG name is still RTCWeb, the mailing list is still rtcweb@ietf.org, the IETF drafts should still have "-rtcweb-" in them to indicate the WG name.

Sounds appropriate to me!

 -r