Re: [rtcweb] Clarification on offer/answer in jsep-01

Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca> Tue, 28 August 2012 12:57 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@iii.ca>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B4DA21F8534 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 05:57:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.478
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.478 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.121, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GjcPGQRlczTS for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 05:57:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net (mxout-07.mxes.net [216.86.168.182]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FFBF21F8539 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 05:57:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.4.100] (unknown [128.107.239.233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 51E0222E25B; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 08:57:51 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.0 \(1486\))
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
In-Reply-To: <A9BAC738-4077-450F-ACC4-DD246292A2EF@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 06:57:49 -0600
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <AB704ACB-877F-4F55-B806-AF4EA771EDD3@iii.ca>
References: <CACKRbQfXam_QqsUdMif-zR0uuiM6VFwP-VDy0q7f_r6gdV_-VQ@mail.gmail.com> <A9BAC738-4077-450F-ACC4-DD246292A2EF@microsoft.com>
To: Francois Audet <francois.audet@skype.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1486)
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Clarification on offer/answer in jsep-01
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 12:57:59 -0000

On Aug 27, 2012, at 10:48 PM, Francois Audet <francois.audet@skype.net> wrote:

>> "As in [RFC3264], an offerer can send an offer, and update it as long
>> as it has not been answered."

yah that won't work or all the reasons mentioned before and in my opinion does not represent the WG consensus. BTW - that was added in the -01 version of the draft and submitted without me ever seeing it - I'd be happy to fix it but I don't have the source for the draft. Chairs?