Re: [rtcweb] RETURN-05

Alan Johnston <alan.b.johnston@gmail.com> Mon, 09 March 2015 17:39 UTC

Return-Path: <alan.b.johnston@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7C321A8BBD for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 10:39:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8L-MPcSrQovb for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 10:39:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vc0-x234.google.com (mail-vc0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD0971A90B2 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 10:39:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vc0-f180.google.com with SMTP id hq12so5551510vcb.11 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 09 Mar 2015 10:39:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=8kzipnZSEhVS3aM6Yf/2AKbrJq6qEJoKtdJtE0O70b0=; b=BPU+emIod9Wp3xKbvMHhPHWUo2z6WIYSv1vcOKQcDiC6OfOrVQW9tYjmc+8NBPQL2Z lW84d/JUhbByW7WEGxHJ7km2RdLYDf9YwSv0dU0c8cTrsZPW0x/vYHV0RVcNcxubN22S 32VK6idmm37ISWzcdaFByNZJzQZnBp+0XCGdJR4s/E22OTo6v//T19vq3ZV0ZDwKH2pB VDduZ61a1rYNGEh9m6uHwUdqQ1MnWSDPeK/oR2IXYlqhdoelsL23V+dOM2eDCav6gsOP YKHDUI78IrwwxE7puphqW+c64q7FbpBESpme1ibR73P1Pe3yCcFAlsXY6RCExhyK4MeU zUtg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.7.228 with SMTP id m4mr35945134vda.31.1425922749933; Mon, 09 Mar 2015 10:39:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.121.111 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 10:39:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAHbrMsA2TdSAL0KefqctG7UG549UG2V9XxFYX6_RbkuGmMSmqw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHbrMsA2TdSAL0KefqctG7UG549UG2V9XxFYX6_RbkuGmMSmqw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2015 12:39:09 -0500
Message-ID: <CAKhHsXGcnyW05HDNqccM+-fCO9aJFLgNSbG=NKUe78y-QK8FVA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alan Johnston <alan.b.johnston@gmail.com>
To: Benjamin Schwartz <bemasc@webrtc.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3033449dfcafdc0510de82b4
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/0qZa9uhPiHQG0flPmwQV1JU5HXE>
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] RETURN-05
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 17:39:14 -0000

I think RETURN is essential for WebRTC to work well across enterprise
borders.  We will increasingly see border TURN servers used by enterprises
to manage and control WebRTC usage, most likely as additions to existing
firewalls and SBCs.  Without RETURN, the usage of border TURN servers will
result in loss of functionality in WebRTC applications that use a TURN
server to provide features in addition to simple NAT traversal.  RETURN
should work perfectly to allow both TURN servers to work, while still
allowing end-to-end encrypted and authenticated media flows.

I’m not aware of any other solutions to the enterprise requirements
identified in Section 3.3.5 of
draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements.  I think we need to move
forward with this draft in RTCWEB.

- Alan -

On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Benjamin Schwartz <bemasc@webrtc.org> wrote:

> New draft of RETURN is up:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-schwartz-rtcweb-return-05
>
> This draft contains a variety of clarifications and changes of emphasis,
> and should hopefully now be easier to read and understand.
>
> Thanks to Alan Johnston and John Yoakum for contributing new figures and
> detailed text review for this revision.
>
> --Ben
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>
>