Re: [rtcweb] [MMUSIC] Is bundle just a port override?

Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca> Fri, 10 May 2013 18:45 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@iii.ca>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B4B521F90DF; Fri, 10 May 2013 11:45:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.27 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.329, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZaOe-Y2C4cDG; Fri, 10 May 2013 11:45:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fallback-in2.mxes.net (fallback-out2.mxes.net [216.86.168.191]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 829A921F9104; Fri, 10 May 2013 11:44:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net (mxout-07.mxes.net [216.86.168.182]) by fallback-in1.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C03C2FD7D9; Fri, 10 May 2013 14:44:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.4.101] (unknown [128.107.239.233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 89F1F22E25C; Fri, 10 May 2013 14:44:47 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
In-Reply-To: <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB1134DC736@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 10:55:12 -0600
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B230CFDD-871F-417E-94ED-893057EE416D@iii.ca>
References: <3879D71E758A7E4AA99A35DD8D41D3D90F6942C3@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com> <514829CE.4010004@alvestrand.no> <3879D71E758A7E4AA99A35DD8D41D3D90F694591@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com> <51489A43.3030109@jitsi.org> <3879D71E758A7E4AA99A35DD8D41D3D90F69476F@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com> <201303191936.r2JJakU4763611@shell01.TheWorld.com> <3879D71E758A7E4AA99A35DD8D41D3D90F6951B8@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com> <CAOJ7v-2eH9oy8=OWVyoUki5ALWSwaB8x_dwpYUDJ-rY_VJ--kw@mail.gmail.com> <3879D71E758A7E4AA99A35DD8D41D3D90F695235@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com> <201303221928.r2MJSOvW960763@shell01.TheWorld.com> <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB1134DC736@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
To: Cullen Jennings (fluffy) <fluffy@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503)
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] [MMUSIC] Is bundle just a port override?
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 18:45:16 -0000

On May 9, 2013, at 9:56 AM, Cullen Jennings (fluffy) <fluffy@cisco.com> wrote:

> 
> On Mar 22, 2013, at 12:28 PM, Dale R. Worley <worley@ariadne.com> wrote:
> 
>>> From: "Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)" <mzanaty@cisco.com>
>>> 
>>> BTW, has anyone actually observed failures?
>> 
>> My memory is that Cullen Jennings knows of a significant installed
>> base of SBCs that choke on SDP that contains duplicated port
>> references.
>> 
>> Dale
> 
> Some of them are using the port as the think to uniquely key into the active data structures. 

Sorry, apple auto correct got me. I mean "thing" not "think"