[rtcweb] Mandatory to implement video codec?

"DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com> Fri, 08 November 2013 02:58 UTC

Return-Path: <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEAC121E8097 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 18:58:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.533
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.533 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.066, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o7K0O-iQlBFF for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 18:58:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ihemail4.lucent.com (ihemail4.lucent.com [135.245.0.39]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D92FC21E8119 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 18:58:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (h135-239-2-122.lucent.com [135.239.2.122]) by ihemail4.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id rA82w9IC006152 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 20:58:11 -0600 (CST)
Received: from FR712WXCHHUB03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr712wxchhub03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.74]) by fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id rA82w9WY030131 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 03:58:09 +0100
Received: from FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.7.239]) by FR712WXCHHUB03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.74]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 03:58:09 +0100
From: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Mandatory to implement video codec?
Thread-Index: Ac7cLiqalLlZVs40QU+PGyClgL6FtQ==
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 02:58:08 +0000
Message-ID: <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8B0CD06D@FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.38]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.39
Subject: [rtcweb] Mandatory to implement video codec?
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 02:58:22 -0000

References have been made to a prior consensus decision to have a mandatory to implement video codec.

I'd like to refresh myself on those discussions and am having difficulty finding them.

Can someone remember when they occurred and therefore point me in the right direction?

Regards

Keith