Re: [rtcweb] Proposal to break the ICE impasse

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Thu, 24 January 2019 21:03 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64AA112DDA3 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 13:03:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.98
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.98 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pSiV9I-RqFFQ for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 13:03:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 492CB12875B for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 13:03:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Svantevit.local (99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x0OL3WVR079848 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 24 Jan 2019 15:03:34 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1548363814; bh=vmupKdg58Zn+6bLf4d2pRjIwyG6lbbLktFrZBPsa2QY=; h=Subject:From:To:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=cX+/C8xe94j4KIMRbgpUSIUb3TwaOGxdZ03Hx6+Vi7Q6nGlpOxsO1o06yOlQQzdaO XAqZ44NdupgjVJa4c7Afgqsnz6VolKbsZ4z98CkoKW1/I9CWsqGyIw4AJpO59Ig4sA VtrobCG720SCouAIfB2JrF0SL8VcKHFHkZKiHsf0=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host 99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228] claimed to be Svantevit.local
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
To: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
References: <97ed2641-8a7e-19a9-be38-a3458ca9212e@nostrum.com> <CAD5OKxserd+XKm-6a1kCZ1tMbm4imF+OasgO7CHXgoF-gmFTsA@mail.gmail.com> <8a06e138-964a-251d-43bf-7eee3a2e67dc@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <cf0a8f1b-f008-293c-8ea9-31fd38ce1687@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 15:03:27 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <8a06e138-964a-251d-43bf-7eee3a2e67dc@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/1CNgj3IKtRbQ_xr2xVKkgy6ge4k>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Proposal to break the ICE impasse
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 21:03:36 -0000

On 1/24/19 3:02 PM, Adam Roach wrote:
> I don't think that's true -- the way JSEP specifies trickle ice, 
> offers for trickle ice will always start with zero candidates, and so 
> the trickling will always use UDP/DTLS/RTP/SAVPF from the start. 


Of course, I meant "UDP/TLS/RTP/SAVPF"

/a