[rtcweb] Decision confirmations needed

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 22 March 2021 09:11 UTC

Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA6AF3A0CAE for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 02:11:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.198
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KF0CeHx3dm4h for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 02:11:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oo1-xc2d.google.com (mail-oo1-xc2d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::c2d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81B653A0C8A for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 02:11:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oo1-xc2d.google.com with SMTP id 125-20020a4a1a830000b02901b6a144a417so3910274oof.13 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 02:11:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=1WNGjRoiQrzlSho90LFLPlLTemoO770JB6VpDGmfUYg=; b=Do7JTi3AVy4Ny1vMV5D0/QEDuSTBFv8aDeie8NS1p88PZn31h8efXf5hq2LgjEW0qv /vIsgNwmdtg3vb81d2sBUVYVDMr++2AmNEsGbQMcKNf1OZrwM7D/Xpwbyg/YDhuodDvb yXJzhoMRIqDIW8Zp9AX/l7l6pbeh7JP4q+37xcgSBJd93uoF8LVdgjQECd+/b7BnNtgY 7ezmnFyYClvK1zNO1D5bsmKuWJ5T4NoUGtAQ0kxcdxuCIIrp/HImgSIORnzuaxqOjViT qvXy6AVLwLO73fDpiAgmmGBGWwQxz+47WuVKvh3Vw7pP6WaUGaN1bT7PboLasfV0Q9Dt Cfgg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=1WNGjRoiQrzlSho90LFLPlLTemoO770JB6VpDGmfUYg=; b=jn5pFop7yBQ47Ux+j4+YwgJx8hnFzmBbat3XMLIjNAoCxVvRWQ7a1QqhxoCm3lqrRw sWt5K7ls5ENhXYwc+xZW2HcjWJ3zh60H2eNPfjBM09wO20+t0RRHii0nBr+t3yUBBLcK 288j0OSxmwtFt5MGNBpjg1hmwlkUadehz2vRJf1gTBveLiSAFw0Zjg/raA235drAX/Zv djj1MicHEJj10nbignjBb2fbJ71PosRrR5xncNE4BqKrSBNzGrZeCPq6dbLtEbrDzORk g3S/JyHAJcgmwBm1sMpf2XwRmCsHyTtVHLMeEJWurS9dvfx5dwdZh0J8gW7uErwS+naF WHWw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533PYEUj4XBXQtooGpmzvOhxaMKHkLDe+8oV5oxTqzEKVd71hVib 6eyittOzZ0D/WogW22olISdhLvPCRuD5JtyHQOAgX6xRHHSWoQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxB/W+4E7knj6OPHbZV8tzAu6/kBa6k4GzOTnJtdC40S7A3UWYBEV6fvtNC5pehAhfRqrqAmlDJ/nR1TLd1bFM=
X-Received: by 2002:a4a:8c4f:: with SMTP id v15mr10470079ooj.25.1616404272511; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 02:11:12 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 09:10:46 +0000
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMCSf8ORoRyAUbkkdo0aONp=H-KzGPt6WmkhVAc0fgpzJQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: RTCWeb IETF <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000079fefb05be1c720f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/1P0RH-4AJjTFSvi47T716eRIkR4>
Subject: [rtcweb] Decision confirmations needed
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 09:11:21 -0000

At the recent meeting there were several decisions which need confirmation.

First, the resolution of the core question of the mismatch between BUNDLE
and JSEP was:

* Switch BUNDLE to match JSEP [Christer volunteered to do it].

If you object to this result, please send a message to the list explaining
why and what you would like to see instead.

For the mechanism to accomplish that, the group in the meeting agreed to:

* Create a new "max-bundle-safe" [name TBD] with current
"max-bundle-behavior". Document that "max-bundle" used to exist and now has
unspecified and deprecated behavior.

If you object to this result, please send a message to the list explaining
why and what you would like to see instead. Note that if you object to the
first point and your reason for the second objection is that you prefer
something else there, you do not need to object again.

On a functional basis the plan i  to re-rev JSEP in place rather than to do
a patch draft.   If you object to that revision plan, please send a message
to the list explaining why and what you would like to see instead.

Christer will discuss the same thing for BUNDLE with the ADs and chairs; if
you have an opinion on that, please send it to the ADs and chairs of both

If you are okay with these results and did not voice your opinion at the
meeting, please send your confirmation to the list.


Ted Hardie