Re: [rtcweb] Video codecs: Clear positions....

Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Wed, 10 December 2014 12:36 UTC

Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A49FF1A8733 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 04:36:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.678
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.678 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cfHFJMdjd8pc for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 04:36:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qc0-f169.google.com (mail-qc0-f169.google.com [209.85.216.169]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A8C01A896B for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 04:36:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qc0-f169.google.com with SMTP id w7so2031697qcr.0 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 04:36:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vGGyqtwvTdom+lDj2PlTLO6SE/w7RXckTRXd6ldOYSM=; b=Y7PAvzhvuX4oAE3ZYyvM8/aWXRnxGCK/I8SH/J1AliGMoCEjNGWgx7ouWJfbDhRSjo JbWnE1RhBWnU9zVrITpMOhnm9csc+A1RBMgeldkBQAZ9MIt4ht8lsKKDo8iFOFLK8Ku1 Fc2NZ5u5p8q5/brH5d0LcC2GT/jqC8nXxTKclqJ+xVH4ycwnaFy5KSJkwqZ3SQKVdRzS wM6g6Vura28mKFAA96TL0MgZ5YzcP9NTl4C39ZamOBBRB6TiHsB+QNv1vATN1x/t49oj sQg+AISpQ7ftfGORodapCfDLE56MJ2CCfeD+0ZFD/ottdGNDIOy4+ZOxD0q0EXJwRnPi bOkw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkf2Qq8eIgxC3rwF42jDg/hNOTxQUIUSlDBwa6il84YxGvXsVvIfJnzlBjxiAzghe6v9Qe5
X-Received: by 10.140.101.145 with SMTP id u17mr7530865qge.84.1418214997780; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 04:36:37 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.96.26.135 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 04:36:17 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <5487331F.8050404@bbs.darktech.org>
References: <5486C48D.8040602@alvestrand.no> <F092E8C6-380C-4B20-B71F-449162617BC5@apple.com> <5487331F.8050404@bbs.darktech.org>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?I=C3=B1aki_Baz_Castillo?= <ibc@aliax.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 13:36:17 +0100
Message-ID: <CALiegfkoS4s3ZSnQcjg+hr-TW6FcDBCVaoh-tJsrEEfJkLRidw@mail.gmail.com>
To: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/1qkvmxgi-k_Tze-3Ezh8PS4_vPk
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Video codecs: Clear positions....
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 12:36:41 -0000

2014-12-09 18:36 GMT+01:00 cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>rg>:
>> Honestly, a +1 for “those other people should do it” is meaningless.
>
>
> That's a fair point. I'm guessing the vast majority of people answering on
> the mailing list only plan to implement one codec because they are
> non-browser implementors.

And probably many people give +1 to "MUST implement both codecs" so
they will just implement H264 in their systems and win anyhow.


-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>