Re: [rtcweb] JS friendly codec compromise?
Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> Tue, 01 April 2014 22:25 UTC
Return-Path: <derhoermi@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A53A71A0A0E for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Apr 2014 15:25:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.563
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.563 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.347, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ldRR22tWR16f for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Apr 2014 15:25:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 826411A08DE for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Apr 2014 15:25:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from netb ([89.204.135.154]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LeeNW-1WpXNX0Kh4-00qSzm; Wed, 02 Apr 2014 00:25:06 +0200
From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
To: Zach Lym <zachlym@indolering.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2014 00:25:05 +0200
Message-ID: <j2fmj9tvssjfl8qa93q5t7to812vmjhjhh@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
References: <CABWuLVey==ZNYog1iLkWiy3Ec6JkOASDPkjg-7BLLenvxf4q+w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABWuLVey==ZNYog1iLkWiy3Ec6JkOASDPkjg-7BLLenvxf4q+w@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:nV04ADS/i23F01xEF6XUntLBy969ukzhZfs8nqXO9NL9UepJ7+W PtiKdj0mWa36IB73FvYI1UrEAni2V2UR+g7okVHliZLvVusARXUCk2sOAmRAm3G9LtRCaF7 lkoBMjwoE7s7l/MRinx9QoBTp1Uu/qsWzuVnpPWJ1NV4tI4cs0JwF4OQoFXOitGmkYDWsNQ Y8sslkC7I3X2+MFbqJj9w==
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/1wR0xOywqP9mBpjm27GlrXau0qc
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] JS friendly codec compromise?
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2014 22:25:14 -0000
* Zach Lym wrote: >While I have my reservations regarding ORBX, the approach (a JS friendly >codec) would be more backwards compatible than h.261 and give better >performance. If a "submarine" patent surfaces the codec can be altered and >clients can be "updated" on the next page refresh. Which aspect of "performance" do you mean here, and could you share some references to support the claim? References to a legal analysis would be helpful aswell. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
- [rtcweb] JS friendly codec compromise? Zach Lym
- Re: [rtcweb] JS friendly codec compromise? Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: [rtcweb] JS friendly codec compromise? Zach Lym
- Re: [rtcweb] JS friendly codec compromise? Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: [rtcweb] JS friendly codec compromise? Zach Lym
- Re: [rtcweb] JS friendly codec compromise? Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] JS friendly codec compromise? Zach Lym