IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Question about ICE-Lite server

Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com> Mon, 07 July 2014 19:39 UTC

Return-Path: <roman@telurix.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00EAC1B28A3 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 12:39:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.678
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.678 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id twYY6alvRWUm for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 12:39:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-f52.google.com (mail-wg0-f52.google.com [74.125.82.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF4591A0AEE for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 12:39:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f52.google.com with SMTP id b13so4833184wgh.11 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 07 Jul 2014 12:39:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=LJN2j9cgY75AbfVItuDlfbDAa2xWnj99MsyXiPZTego=; b=WMGhxMIQoFwr8pQ74XqpnSE47fkqVt2BIMLfaX27Lgu9z5dMa6rHlQu/MM6JRVPbem H9AISRZnq7LXovQJMgOnTsHA4wYcEq1OTxtwrb1h0wF6BEudHKWaayfMcN1OPIzmlxzQ IKUQWEX+9YT+XKfG377aoMIKluQUP2yrecyhpUri7HufZfpFIWxwvZYjBDpZ17JD/YXq R9iVNQ8KMonN9at7UoJfX5cs0MPBDQr/8yugjfMn0QtH/v2hfBaydCls/9jdgzEcLJ2b YsTYe1zFqOx1hRKtLrVv0B4W+U7hreRHxS/e/NhJzH2XdOP6krzp3i2IhG2EwFYDBnHu 427g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlttZInxFdUK+Wtc37bSSL49KPl19f1Y97MtW8TS02qQpuvyteV99voLvnBUOiG5rIOXccZ
X-Received: by 10.181.13.80 with SMTP id ew16mr38896220wid.51.1404761995197; Mon, 07 Jul 2014 12:39:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-f171.google.com (mail-we0-f171.google.com [74.125.82.171]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id n2sm89006730wjf.40.2014.07.07.12.39.54 for <rtcweb@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 07 Jul 2014 12:39:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f171.google.com with SMTP id q58so4957264wes.2 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 07 Jul 2014 12:39:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.92.177 with SMTP id cn17mr35334313wjb.71.1404761993736; Mon, 07 Jul 2014 12:39:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.217.131.17 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 12:39:53 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CALiegfk5XMO6ShgugD3tXNx=Z2CN-R8NwCDJF9DTgq+V8j8Yig@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALiegf=kLtiUKoue=ahXP4fUhLJNNd8vCaQTECQxjK5R7cjLTQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxv8s5-FNR-kq0C01H_Ev39cyBs5P__Pd-0cmCXDFYy-YQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBPV_iVcSmi+ndDaYY6zX=F7TRoSDFqe5hzJP3-NjZ7Y1w@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegf=CMAOwVF3=gNY9qrsTfsEwuiwvGZ_1SaS0waOUE83-Ug@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBMPyT4y1v12O5pb7Khs2ge0pgjUugrBS0NoK8=SLOScxQ@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfmjywprsFvsQg10S0nGw08XhuCAjDrqgx2=ZfV-T6_PVA@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBM+ywkbXbE6=fz7Z9kmZkpsqW385kntoXW2RAR1eaWu1A@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegf=_6je5kqwPETMGmU+tznypJLEnTdvMa2+i5Nae=t9vTA@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D3B608F@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CALiegfk5XMO6ShgugD3tXNx=Z2CN-R8NwCDJF9DTgq+V8j8Yig@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2014 15:39:53 -0400
Message-ID: <CAD5OKxvFO_B3kFRv3twF4NDAy6KXf7NhC=N2W6y09KFrVV5wqA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
To: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7beb91aaa179e704fd9fa383"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/1xFjMMORp17i1Tx3J7Pb3f5IHUQ
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Question about ICE-Lite server
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2014 19:39:58 -0000

On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 6:25 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> wrote:

> 2014-07-07 11:03 GMT+02:00 Christer Holmberg <
> christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>:
> > I also we more or less had agreed on this in the past, that ICE-Lite is
> ok e.g. for gateways.
>
> Oh, and also for much more interesting servers than gateways! :)
>
>
>
I also agree that ICE-Lite must be supported and regular nomination should
be used with it to avoid timing issues.

Also, I wanted to make sure it would be possible to use ICE-TCP with an
ICE-Lite with WebRTC end-points. Using ICE-TCP with ICE-Lite would probably
create a simplest possible way to implement services that only need to
setup client to server communications since they would be able to operate
without the need for separate STUN and TURN servers.

I have a question regarding ICE-Lite support with IPv6: Does anybody
currently actively uses ICE-Lite with hosts that include both IPv4 and IPv6
candidates? I always felt that exact operation of such servers was
under-defined, so any real world experience would be extremely interesting.

_____________
Roman Shpount

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email