IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB is not SIP

Erik Lagerway <elagerway@gmail.com> Sat, 12 November 2011 03:07 UTC

Return-Path: <elagerway@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB8F111E8088 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:07:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.602
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.602 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_57=0.6, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d6Exlt0bqKpm for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:07:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-gy0-f172.google.com (mail-gy0-f172.google.com [209.85.160.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB7D511E8087 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:07:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by gye5 with SMTP id 5so4218245gye.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:07:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:message-id:cc:x-mailer:from:subject:date:to; bh=ocMHS55032zukfrn7FfAS0ET8vMBTAy1RAMIC8ZcVc0=; b=K2qSiL8FtZnyVIqJsmUxlpifKZpIos/tZwiktlXKNRC0x1HtpPXf/KLkQRFQ3APAg+ 9JD+ZTisKKIKGXstQ+v2gi725ic9Xav/TcmpSeZJ9TZbdgltCO7Ek30d62qDZJgW1jNZ O+CgP/M5zy4zVJ9PNSHRYq76V0GyDCEnt65TI=
Received: by 10.236.131.72 with SMTP id l48mr900179yhi.90.1321067259573; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:07:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.95.81.124] ([70.28.245.124]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 33sm23747147ano.1.2011.11.11.19.07.36 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:07:37 -0800 (PST)
References: <4EB26D22.5090000@ericsson.com> <FA65A239-CC86-4AC3-8A5A-91B7701C3FB5@cisco.com> <BLU152-W488BAA56546BEA4D42B4C893DF0@phx.gbl> <4EBA741A.1010307@alvestrand.no> <CAAJUQMiv3EyT3MzAUCzfXusG2Md-DnkA0sa3Hnx5CGVdh919ag@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfkCQv75=ACNB2vK1Mi=S4Q=nastG_LUgd1ohzSeKmBVtQ@mail.gmail.com> <387F9047F55E8C42850AD6B3A7A03C6C0134A992@inba-mail01.sonusnet.com> <CALiegfkZvViEmeOBpE00XyATLfRKs4EVii6UzuBFfW3a7KkNDw@mail.gmail.com> <BLU0-SMTP1090D4D5685F6B147F5A03093DD0@phx.gbl> <C0607A52-6D23-4941-8462-11A0D3510022@danyork.org>
In-Reply-To: <C0607A52-6D23-4941-8462-11A0D3510022@danyork.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8L1)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-1--837328236"
Message-Id: <1E43243C-4BF3-4E5A-98DD-9720558A0FAF@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8L1)
From: Erik Lagerway <elagerway@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:07:31 -0800
To: Dan York <dan-ietf@danyork.org>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 20:47:10 -0800
Cc: "<rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB is not SIP
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 03:07:40 -0000

Yes, I agree. SIP should take a back seat in this WG, as should jingle etc.

On 2011-11-11, at 10:24 AM, Dan York <dan-ietf@danyork.org> wrote:

> +1
> 
> On Nov 11, 2011, at 6:44 AM, Bernard Aboba wrote:
> 
>> +1
>> 
>> Iñaki Baz Castillo said:
>>> 
>>> WebRTC is not SIP...
>>> 
>>> IMHO we should stop talking about SIP in this WG....
>> 
>>> First priority is to define WebRTC regardless of federation...
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtcweb mailing list
>> rtcweb@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
> 
> -- 
> Dan York  dyork@lodestar2.com
> http://www.danyork.com/   skype:danyork
> Phone: +1-802-735-1624
> Twitter - http://twitter.com/danyork
> --------------------------------------------------------
> All comments and opinions are entirely my own and have no connection whatsoever to any employer, past or present. Indeed, by tomorrow even I might be disavowing these comments.
> --------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email