IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87

"Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com> Fri, 12 July 2013 00:55 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8996C21F9A05 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 17:55:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.549
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.549 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.050, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yA1LdZBAYotE for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 17:55:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA36E11E824A for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 17:55:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1246; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1373590545; x=1374800145; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=zo26QuWc/X3ASpKaHS/K1qTnqZZ20/r8m6ueFVp53rE=; b=XIl3PVtRd2KF0GuZGH0ZQvreyhbchUb54MO77ZEcqkMlHsKBbCtq8jkF 98q+wbjRSrXvA8Oi4a2+92F4Re08t40vqN3tUmM1N4hViMkuGWkxOScCp CujvBGIHWMh3HtwAdeF3Z1LjLJk1Y40PDIphkBqh/GRVeSvi8ff8iKy+5 s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgMFAHRT31GtJXG8/2dsb2JhbABagwY0T8FWgQcWdIIjAQEBAwF5BQsCAQgYCiQhESUCBA4FCId1AwkGDK4YDYhejHiCNgIxAgWDCWwDiG+NBIMTin6FJoMRgig
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.89,649,1367971200"; d="scan'208";a="233865259"
Received: from rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com ([173.37.113.188]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 12 Jul 2013 00:55:45 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com [173.37.183.81]) by rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r6C0tj45029250 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 12 Jul 2013 00:55:45 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com ([169.254.5.116]) by xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com ([173.37.183.81]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 19:55:44 -0500
From: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>
To: Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87
Thread-Index: AQHOfm4gl1Vkg5a8kUyEc2Bfr2lLkplgNbUAgAAIzICAAD/FgIAADcIA
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 00:55:44 +0000
Message-ID: <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB1135D4AA8@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
References: <CA+9kkMBuCTdFsUMtmuBz6BnrSJMpHywEZU+x+m8ARnGprvzDzA@mail.gmail.com> <CAPvvaa+dyYmvsareEy1a9+7ketEFjNarsnRLXkpT_YHPTYni2w@mail.gmail.com> <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB1135D31FD@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com> <CABkgnnU9r9OT+XW=Ewf=25yBJGCEZxCVnu_r1D=Eu=f9wrV4Kg@mail.gmail.com> <51DF0BA6.8040609@nostrum.com> <CABkgnnWDDAgODjQa9+noMULOOjbkuMYCpbNWCf6QLV_WLjDVgw@mail.gmail.com> <CAHBDyN5xHG3hXsWFpcXXpujyzcQweFDa-bzOOv-0uheXyH-gYA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHBDyN5xHG3hXsWFpcXXpujyzcQweFDa-bzOOv-0uheXyH-gYA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.21.126.7]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <A14EF8D5202E234FA9CDA16CAAA7D23F@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "<rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 00:55:50 -0000

On Jul 11, 2013, at 5:06 PM, Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
 wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Martin Thomson
> <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 11 July 2013 12:46, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote:
>>> Jointly by the chairs of RTCWEB and WebRTC, based on
>>> <http://www.w3.org/2011/04/webrtc-charter.html> and
>>> <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/rtcweb/charters>, one would presume.
>> 
>> To be perfectly clear, that's precisely what makes me nervous.
> 
> [MB] Me too. [/MB]

One might read this to imply that this was chair decision about the scope, but in this case, I don't think the chairs have very much to do with if the no-plan draft happens to be in scope of this WG or not.  As the authors explained it, it is purely an API change with no changes to anything on the wire. Everyone in this WG seems to agree on where API works happens and I have not heard any disagreement on that. Of course that not surprising that there is not disagreement on this as the charters of WebRTC and RTCWeb seem relatively clear on this.

On the decision of what to put on a draft agenda before the -00 deadline, of course Ted and I take responsibility for the current draft agenda.

v2.27.6 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status