Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward

Leon Geyser <lgeyser@gmail.com> Thu, 14 November 2013 09:37 UTC

Return-Path: <lgeyser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 007DE21E81DB for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 01:37:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.368
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.368 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.231, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id muJXvp01IgUc for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 01:37:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-la0-x22b.google.com (mail-la0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B92FF21E819A for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 01:37:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-la0-f43.google.com with SMTP id n7so1326392lam.2 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 01:37:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=FwMwmrRyCF5DhW+EWLhrxTUMgPBeBjNSRQTOF2cdZxU=; b=QSIlxg5ZCSb2mRlPryTFoSeZ1J+wHrbXCphC0seZGIx3Rf5BMqU5iiyKpT14Te2z5q IohET9qEEnIghmH/0uQxFazFpCWkUKc/a4VNE+BdpQLc82cxNuxFW0WIpMjvZbULPepk aXa7YG1qPRqD38p/AYGxXhmmzTIwPf9V+1fM1uH8lvKGLSqIADlbWTJmi+3ckIKYaXt/ tM9XtNU8nVvtp5RdbGHPy8ZTw3IK3DeYtA15MOiivVZeMG/GcEIMhe+bZhdbImuEOGYn OP7164oSVC3X5UI7ihwGfRR0Gbtl6CPxp+kUX7QKBSe/Ai6ILgqfLlpU2xxsKunvR1nH mg2w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.120.73 with SMTP id la9mr259946lab.3.1384421835464; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 01:37:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.114.168.70 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 01:37:15 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <528492E8.8020202@ericsson.com>
References: <5283DFDC.4010906@ericsson.com> <528492E8.8020202@ericsson.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 11:37:15 +0200
Message-ID: <CAGgHUiQW_fuJwnLaw4E51kVoznRsdbbgMQBtfYg91LL88Q34Dw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Leon Geyser <lgeyser@gmail.com>
To: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e011766e5b8e54c04eb1fd362
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 09:37:18 -0000

Point 6 can change to:
All entities MUST support H.261 and all entities MUST support at least one
of H.264 and VP8
or it can be made a new point?

I don't like point 5 at all since it doesn't really help with negotiation
failure IMO. Implement the codec that you want to implement = No MTI.


On 14 November 2013 11:07, Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com
> wrote:

> WG,
>
> I have put the given video codec selection alternatives on this wikipage:
>
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/rtcweb/trac/wiki/WikiStart
>
> It is not acceptable to simply add things on this list. You need to send
> email to the list.
>
> Cheers
>
> Magnus
>
>
> On 2013-11-13 21:23, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:
> > Folks,
> >
> > I hope everybody had a safe trip back home after Vancouver.
> >
> > As you all know, we need to make progress regarding the selection of the
> > MTI video codec. The following are some of the alternatives we have on
> > the table:
> >
> >  1. All entities MUST support H.264
> >  2. All entities MUST support VP8
> >  3. All entities MUST support both H.264 and VP8
> >  4. Browsers MUST support both H.264 and VP8
> >  5. All entities MUST support either H.264 or VP8
> >  6. All entities MUST support H.261
> >  7. There is no MTI video codec
> >
> > If you want the group to consider additional alternatives to the ones
> > above, please let the group know within the following *two weeks*. At
> > that point, the chairs will be listing all the received alternatives and
> > proposing a process to select one among them.
> >
> > Please, send your proposals in an email to the list. You do not need to
> > write a draft; just send the text you would like to see in the final
> > document regarding video codecs.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Gonzalo
> > Responsible AD for this WG
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rtcweb mailing list
> > rtcweb@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
> >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Magnus Westerlund
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ericsson AB                | Phone  +46 10 7148287
> Färögatan 6                | Mobile +46 73 0949079
> SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>