Re: [rtcweb] Proposal for H.263 baseline codec

Dean Willis <dean.willis@softarmor.com> Fri, 20 April 2012 04:42 UTC

Return-Path: <dean.willis@softarmor.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F9D321F8417 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 21:42:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.519
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.519 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.080, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dQo-AffhxkYM for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 21:42:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com (mail-ob0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A289C21F8527 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 21:42:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by obbwd20 with SMTP id wd20so8788777obb.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 21:42:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=softarmor.com; s=google; h=references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:message-id :content-transfer-encoding:cc:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; bh=szpB1tSd7B6M1hYE1qZy6awW2KUMKi7rdgWjxgCCFwM=; b=aZ2AOp0xEdh8bU1euAheY01gHksC2SaKQHT7FdUSXqzlNiD1bd8G924DispbwSnGid K5hlTbK9IYqfSjXU4EJvc0lj+HPVnAg2ng8qh7iHnf8qWnJSkZM8c80bXA3zKPOdaOSt mVvuSDmcj0ZrAQjmGGVlieKfX9N9x4ML3laus=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:message-id :content-transfer-encoding:cc:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer :x-gm-message-state; bh=szpB1tSd7B6M1hYE1qZy6awW2KUMKi7rdgWjxgCCFwM=; b=D35bJCkjna7AuvXgKGu3WJe7D+hrxijCPNrz6F+hv2OnpTynldbROxhtRDmVV62RgG uEl+iqeXESkdsE25bqFWSZgtDNqsB1lY3G1vVHe+aIKk37QHpy31SBiuGq+NtFf3tpF7 3e/YQnIMUk8YyrzomSQwc4G8D223Zfr9eqhxt+MT5Lt+vwR2OI22uK7s6A2tXLVL6O62 2yB83V7LJ3RoVo/O3G7zr8ruLuu4QS0M0DJPLxWd2wyD1iBEi2Z6bG6AMqYvsqfz/Yyg aEM8sMHE6bmDOB+ccApOszlqBouqg3YtDUDJ/8wtAOCaoFT7gQdqpve/83ZPdyvMCTEz 3leg==
Received: by 10.182.207.10 with SMTP id ls10mr6848575obc.9.1334896961374; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 21:42:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.119] (cpe-66-25-15-110.tx.res.rr.com. [66.25.15.110]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h5sm5295565oba.17.2012.04.19.21.42.40 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 19 Apr 2012 21:42:40 -0700 (PDT)
References: <4F746163.5090506@hidayahonline.org> <CB9A367A.85338%stewe@stewe.org> <CAHp8n2nyNAaYYdFms+ZRx1uZTWVvi623B9Pb8GARtnNcEtxmMg@mail.gmail.com> <4F8FBB8E.6000802@jesup.org> <CAJNg7VLp1f5T_HjoPJ9ihRDj92QwSGGvM5APmUAEuvvPf6FnoQ@mail.gmail.com> <4F903010.80504@jesup.org>
In-Reply-To: <4F903010.80504@jesup.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Message-Id: <DE88BE4B-F4C8-44C8-967E-96B04E2F3A3E@softarmor.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Dean Willis <dean.willis@softarmor.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 23:42:39 -0500
To: Randell Jesup <randell-ietf@jesup.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQks5/vYk5QpWuwIjM+dcD39relvs8fMpm/EiF3xDFDggmmt+Uqi9okDjs6eMjMCAgHeE15z
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Proposal for H.263 baseline codec
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 04:42:58 -0000

On Apr 19, 2012, at 10:32 AM, Randell Jesup wrote:

>> 
> 
> Quite true (though I've played one on TV^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H amateur lawyer quite a bit in a former job).  That document agrees with my comments (IANAL!!) so far as I can tell, and the basic answer is still "No, do not assume you're safe because you're using a codec published more than 6 years ago."  Not assuming you're safe is always the safe thing to do.  ;-)
> 

To paraphrase Whedon: You're never truly safe; the ancient ones are down there waiting. Miss a blood sacrifice, and there''s hell to pay.

Or,  Lubarsky's alternative cognate: There's always one more patent.

There is, however, a margin of safety in numbers. If many little red riding hoods have walked the path before you and others walk beside you, the chance of meeting a wolf are reduced. Or you might just meet a VERY HUNGRY wolf. But you have a chance of hearing the screams and being able to run away.

On the other hand, if you KNOW there's  a wolf on the hunt, stay home.

--
Dean