IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' opinions of the current WebRTC API and SDP as a control surface

Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca> Fri, 19 July 2013 14:00 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@iii.ca>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F6AA21E80B9 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 07:00:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.359
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.359 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.075, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.619]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mmoptp0KeQg4 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 07:00:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxout-08.mxes.net (mxout-08.mxes.net [216.86.168.183]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BED3A21E80C8 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 07:00:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.171.47.8] (unknown [209.121.225.136]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E98B650A89; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 10:00:22 -0400 (EDT)
References: <CAJrXDUGMohpBdi-ft-o_uE7ewFkw7wRY9x7gYEncjov7qi-Bew@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBPa4wBS8pYq=0wesMOfL6TkeC7QGAZ8pWwOcnkhkJqWfA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUFxo8P8wxh8jX3019yPQOuwQ0eVdsFmRXsbWdWinnc5oA@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBOTKpmFC34waqZ4kA-P8t+E6yY9gX1JFCHhsBH0+CF-Qw@mail.gmail.com> <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C30BC0F@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAD5OKxtKLMf_d=8GSMrqfNhDHPe9MFP2ZTKzZHFn9CyMr-gSVQ@mail.gmail.com> <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C30C833@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAJrXDUHOZf21aXgQMrdjTV8Fok+fVp-2SuhTra0JGy0Jq=Wi0Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAHp8n2mNdNiXCCNUdEvKgAsh_pPn=jNs+56VCg4PMKbUmOGztQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnUZMAuDocwZWXn9a+Xj3kkcX0uyRgjDmy-hQxpTDKWj3w@mail.gmail.com> <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C30CF49@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CALiegfmiRsOXL97XDzMRQ_Vvbk9zaDBBvCPxr_=zbDJbnMZ_8A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALiegfmiRsOXL97XDzMRQ_Vvbk9zaDBBvCPxr_=zbDJbnMZ_8A@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Message-Id: <E795F35A-B0A5-4BD8-B807-C97B76EC586B@iii.ca>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (10B329)
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 07:00:24 -0700
To: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
Cc: "<rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' opinions of the current WebRTC API and SDP as a control surface
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 14:00:29 -0000

Can someone please email a full copy of the spreadsheet to the list so it is in the archives - thanks

On Jul 9, 2013, at 3:18 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> wrote:

> 2013/7/9 Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>:
>> I want to be very clear and careful on what I say. So I am repeating:
>> 
>> * My comment that I think Eric is right in that there is consensus on
>> providing APIs that allow most use-cases to be met without SDP mangling
>> is meant only in that context: SDP O/A is kept (and PeerConnection more
>> or less as is and so on).
> 
> Hi Stefan,
> 
> You insist that "there is consensus on keeping SDP O/A but providing a
> better API". Given current discussions IMHO it is clear there is not
> such a consensus (not at all). Or may be you are just talking about
> two years ago in some IETF meeting (if so I'm sorry).
> 
> Please review the results in
> https://docs.google.com/a/aliax.net/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AuaKXw3SkHMSdHlZdV9RN0xSWFhybVl4anJLRkVPV0E#gid=1
> 
>  Bad for advanced stuff: 94%
>  OK for 1.0: 40%
> 
> IMHO such a result indicates all but "let's keep SDP O/A and improve a
> bit the API" (I mean now, in July 2013).
> 
> 
> Best regards.
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Iñaki Baz Castillo
> <ibc@aliax.net>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email