IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Agenda for the upcoming meeting

Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net> Sun, 19 October 2014 21:38 UTC

Return-Path: <peter@andyet.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F21921A00A3 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 14:38:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XIiXlPVnB-OH for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 14:38:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-f179.google.com (mail-ie0-f179.google.com [209.85.223.179]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D7CE1A003B for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 14:38:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f179.google.com with SMTP id ar1so3619836iec.38 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 14:38:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=KBpSTPDjuvSy6rMlA4/it9NaQVhv+PmsOZZI7ezlHj4=; b=OhG3ZCZKnAsCE+jULINTz/qeVL8tDYspOVwrNyrjj9OYgKcknutwHBttWzX1Dj1iZQ 7Q3IK+PvFqJmlISC92abjGgilZWQB4gDWs2b/SmD+xrLSAYnwDSg9688ljjI9BgnN0Pt yg+FFPovQDKe468YS/aidGYCKe498ViPhJ4tMDTS2m7ViDjK8dX1a15DZZwDV2yreEjE crPqyT3CFD3ltLjgR1+jrtP22p3w6EpZTp7tlbkMaaTRpRdiTGJW3Csf0j5KgyT5Bf2K YQrQP76fyX5UVt3oEkZnL6HpOjIxHOLYdR6mR8jafOd+exPXnFa2psuu2eY50L7IogLG mW1A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkWtoVpEh0+dxOlBYt7R+B3P7uBM7022fPQ6y0KDqMBf5T/lP9ZsVoWAG39cnOWaC8WO3cY
X-Received: by 10.50.164.233 with SMTP id yt9mr14085137igb.2.1413754707827; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 14:38:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aither.local (c-73-34-202-214.hsd1.co.comcast.net. [73.34.202.214]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id x193sm3670902iod.17.2014.10.19.14.38.27 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 19 Oct 2014 14:38:27 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <54442F52.3090608@andyet.net>
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 15:38:26 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com>, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
References: <CA+9kkMBQobeA_6aiMZffA6hHNkySK+CZptJU0XYzDyxGF4xE2A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMBQobeA_6aiMZffA6hHNkySK+CZptJU0XYzDyxGF4xE2A@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/2PtRFwGYXYvkyOzIVRBqO8QIXvs
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Agenda for the upcoming meeting
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 21:38:32 -0000

On 10/16/14, 11:10 AM, Ted Hardie wrote:
> During this morning chairs call, we discussed the agenda for the
> upcoming meeting.  The two big items are JSEP and the video codec
> discussion, and our current thought is to have the JSEP discussion on
> Monday and the video codec discussion on Thursday.

As far as I can see, the temper of the list has been that it would be 
premature and a waste of energy to discuss the video codec topic at IETF 
91. Do the chairs see things differently?

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://andyet.com/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email