Re: [rtcweb] Basic scenario 'impossible?' to achieve with the actual API

Thanks Enrico,

Yes, you are right. I was missing a detail.

Now imagine you are not using your own wire protocol but a standard one,
where accepting the request doesn't imply accepting or rejecting the SDP
offer, since SDP has its own methods to accept or reject the call as
commented before.

A --{"action":"CALL","sdp":"v=0..."}-> B
B --{"action":"ACCEPT CALL","sdp":"v=0..."}-> A

A --{"action":"CALL","sdp":"v=0..."}-> B
B --{"action":"ACCEPT CALL","sdp":"v=0\r\nm=video 0..."}-> A

2013/7/2 Enrico Marocco <enrico.marocco@telecomitalia.it>

> On 7/2/13 6:04 PM, José Luis Millán wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Please, let me know how this normal use case could be solved with the
> > current API.
>
> Just off the top of my head:
>
> Audio-only call establishment:
>
> A --{"action":"CALL","sdp":"v=0..."}-> B
> B --{"action":"ACCEPT CALL","sdp":"v=0..."}-> A
>
> Rejected audio+video upgrade proposal:
>
> A --{"action":"UPGRADE","sdp":"v=0..."}-> B
> B --{"action":"REJECT UPGRADE"}-> A
>
> Alice rolls back and removes local video display.
>
> I may be missing something, but doesn't look like rocket science to me...
>
> Enrico
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>
>

-- 
José Luis Millán