Re: [rtcweb] JSEP and draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation-03

On 2013-02-18 21:25, Bernard Aboba wrote:
> Christer said:
>
>  > Good questions, for which I don't have any answers at this point :)
>  >
>  > But, IF we can agree on this as a way forward, one of the next steps
> is to look at the JSEP impacts.
>
> [BA] The problem is that my opinion will differ depending on whether the
> SDP in question is to be used in the API or over the wire.
>
> The "different port" formulation makes good sense to me if you are
> looking for backward compatibility with existing SIP/SDP implementations
> which are likely to send an error in response to a "same port"
> formulation.   So if this is an "on the wire" question I give it a
> thumbs up.
>
> However, if you are asking me whether it makes sense for createOffer()
> to output SDP with different ports by default, when 99 percent of
> applications are likely to not be doing SIP interop, I would say "no".
> Then the next question is whether there needs to be a mechanism in the
> API for indicating a preference for different ports, when this is desired.

That sounds like a reasonable approach to me (and the default would be 
one port).

Stefan

>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>