Re: [rtcweb] WG Action: Rechartered Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers (rtcweb)

Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> Mon, 08 March 2021 19:31 UTC

Return-Path: <juberti@google.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2461A3A1841 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 11:31:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o59aqX2tDL0n for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 11:31:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb33.google.com (mail-yb1-xb33.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B02D63A1811 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 11:31:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb33.google.com with SMTP id c131so11338416ybf.7 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 11:31:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=nYdIUCpryisUeop9Sn1i+rQIpDKPCU56Qk4uwMmYaRk=; b=ACJuzR6MjwXZlZgBm9yW/pcjq3Nop/GG4h4qZA/Y5q9TJpu19bPWHkXVXleX7fWgFy iWhO4zJSNBwEi6tLC5MyqXXQ/e5f/nfZm7OO7Rn0H3jB1z7bFH2R9ffGtUtYky6GDVl9 iaQVKw5ShWCq3fJo3Vx6lgGvpJlnIUFbbQl6zhLj61LO/JlwzZE0n9ATQQ3t9VUky3HW KvOo8PXReS07nFU78mjQslTx3fH/Y0zvDwV8KvUvAFP459oM2TgBUiXdLLN5glkSc8DR zkmC3aYLJ8tXnSbsd64+L0Xu5xM/YNd471qLD9R78I2u3Ag26OxH9oG6SCbwjn333nav t74g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=nYdIUCpryisUeop9Sn1i+rQIpDKPCU56Qk4uwMmYaRk=; b=fzcavwLjiWb17sCpmx3GGa3C2IBc1FijU21+kbndET74/+dNIkpyeTbU1domsFCPEq BXcMgTTEzuLoQe/uHojlOfp8dkQ1J0WO74aefSOG97I6ym8HLNyEI21bR5UobnPhNt1h QgrayrsNzwEFiJWMLQ1UBuYpH3Q0v8KMz6rE2Hwb0Tal8jT/95swIChqJPg0FLYe0cvE XFlNFHtEow1VBgHDXm0xtEXhBtl/HL5vqI6wr4vfxw1V8wgAe01NV7pKnxVtjcaF5J1n L5XBveP3JoWa+NN8ws1WKE0luF9GOV8w+x12O8VWyfYOhyWSDbsYmsvKuNXitXsqCZCj 74hw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530zppkHPEcqQ6REpBGV6RYOC7xzLMHQlJtPp3/kYB2wpa4V28pU tb1FtbA4bSwfBXw4Vxxt15xdAQrqEK2TlL2KHa9p4MFqQA9QZA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxnkbH2si7aCeD7EvtwdokCWN2PIEgLcYweh2cMbxlWpQfbzKpmgjeny1Gk1Zaec608LRtzihHaNezrB8DPH28=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:d642:: with SMTP id n63mr35208260ybg.390.1615231861384; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 11:31:01 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <161375655330.29021.8215379109983130364@ietfa.amsl.com> <CA+9kkMCEmVsVj2cfabV-L03Rt_RWrboRGime4ebv=9KTS=EnUA@mail.gmail.com> <AM0PR07MB38604A4C86EF63AC017596FE93839@AM0PR07MB3860.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CAD5OKxvksjRghr6gT_7-zRsY8E4WBS-PM1JdgOP0D3p8bYN+AQ@mail.gmail.com> <VI1PR07MB38715CF957088531DBCD7F4193839@VI1PR07MB3871.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CAOJ7v-0eOBt0zr_7tsaL+En1w7SGuuH67_aA39bbBOQNsgm3Vw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOJ7v-0eOBt0zr_7tsaL+En1w7SGuuH67_aA39bbBOQNsgm3Vw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 11:30:47 -0800
Message-ID: <CAOJ7v-0aSCzxq7u-+0c+1XN99Rahpv-c2SDH=bE=kKW9aGaERQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
Cc: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>, RTCWeb IETF <rtcweb@ietf.org>, "rtcweb-chairs@ietf.org" <rtcweb-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="00000000000054859205bd0b7979"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/2pSKNMtzJbQBEjBViZZhlFFEV0c>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] WG Action: Rechartered Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers (rtcweb)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2021 19:31:52 -0000

The slides have been reworked based on feedback that was provided. Here's
the latest version that I plan to present on Friday.

On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 1:44 PM Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> wrote:

> Here's an initial set of slides that I put together the other day, still a
> few ??? to address:
> https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1aprC-TwmLI_zGdWgnTdKVYvaqXNkcf9eMgMhAIzv8Ek/edit?usp=sharing&resourcekey=0-8HY7ugai8XnQyH4sA8cQdAcQdA.
> Please have a look and feel free to leave comments in the preso.
>
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 1:53 PM Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg=
> 40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi Roman,
>>
>>
>>
>> >You are probably the most qualified to do so. Let me know if you need
>> any help regarding the current implementation status or backward interop
>> testing.
>>
>>
>>
>> I don’t have much information, so feel free to send me whatever you have
>> :)
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>>
>> Christer
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 1:25 PM Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg=
>> 40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> I could present the JSEP/BUNDLE specification misalignment, unless
>> someone else wants to.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>>
>> Christer
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* rtcweb <rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of *Ted Hardie
>> *Sent:* perjantai 19. helmikuuta 2021 20.11
>> *To:* RTCWeb IETF <rtcweb@ietf.org>
>> *Cc:* rtcweb-chairs@ietf.org
>> *Subject:* Re: [rtcweb] WG Action: Rechartered Real-Time Communication
>> in WEB-browsers (rtcweb)
>>
>>
>>
>> And we're back.
>>
>>
>>
>> This is hopefully for a limited engagement, as the charter is quite
>> pointed on what we have to do.
>>
>>
>>
>> We do have a meeting slot at IETF 110, Friday March 12, 12:00 UTC (the
>> first slot on the final day, in other words). The bulk of the time will be
>> spent on the handling of "m=" sections that are designated as bundle-only.
>> If you want to present on this, please send a note to the WG as soon as
>> possible.  If you have some other agenda item, please let Sean and me know,
>> and we'll discuss it with you.
>>
>>
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>>
>>
>> Ted and Sean
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 9:42 AM The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> wrote:
>>
>> The Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers (rtcweb) WG in the
>> Applications
>> and Real-Time Area of the IETF has been rechartered. For additional
>> information, please contact the Area Directors or the WG Chairs.
>>
>> Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers (rtcweb)
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Current status: Proposed WG
>>
>> Chairs:
>>   Sean Turner <sean+ietf@sn3rd.com>
>>   Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
>>
>> Assigned Area Director:
>>   Murray Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
>>
>> Applications and Real-Time Area Directors:
>>   Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
>>   Murray Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
>>
>> Mailing list:
>>   Address: rtcweb@ietf.org
>>   To subscribe: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>>   Archive: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/
>>
>> Group page: https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/rtcweb/
>>
>> Charter: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-rtcweb/
>>
>> The RTCWEB working group was originally chartered to standardize
>> mechanisms
>> that provide direct interactive rich communication using audio, video,
>> collaboration, games, etc. between two peers' web-browsers, without
>> requiring
>> non-standard extensions or proprietary plug-ins.  The result was a set of
>> RFCs from RTCWEB, in addition to many other RFCs from other working
>> groups,
>> all of which are interrelated and had to be published together in what the
>> RFC Editor refers to as a “cluster”.  In the end, that cluster comprised
>> more
>> than 40 RFCs and was finally published in January 2021.
>>
>> During the run-up to publication of the cluster, a contradiction was
>> identified between what became RFCs 8829 and 8843.  A description of this
>> contradiction was added to both documents to highlight the problem, and
>> state
>> our intention to proceed with publication but quickly initiate an effort
>> to
>> publish updates to the affected documents.
>>
>> The key part of the added text was as follows:
>>
>> “The specific issue involves the handling of "m=" sections that are
>> designated as bundle-only, as discussed in Section 4.1.1 of [RFC 8829].
>> Currently, there is divergence between JSEP and BUNDLE, as well as between
>> these specifications and existing browser implementations …”
>>
>> The working group is being reconstituted to take up this contradiction,
>> come
>> to consensus on a resolution, and issue Standards Track updates for those
>> two
>> documents.  Specifically, the goal of this work is to address only the
>> contradictions regarding "bundle-only" between BUNDLE and JSEP.  The
>> resulting aligned solution should avoid impacting the interoperability
>> with
>> SDP Offer/Answer.  Finally, the impact on existing implementations that
>> are
>> affected by any change is to be considered.
>>
>> draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp, which has not yet been published, will be returned
>> to
>> the working group to be updated according to the resolution of the issue
>> described above.  The working group will therefore produce updates to the
>> JSEP and BUNDLE documents, and re-submit draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp for
>> publication after it has been revised.  Updating any other document, or
>> taking up any other issue, is out of scope and will require IESG approval
>> via
>> rechartering.
>>
>> Coordination with the MMUSIC working group to develop this solution will
>> be
>> required.
>>
>> Milestones:
>>
>>   Aug 2021 - Update to draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp to the IESG as Informational.
>>
>>   Aug 2021 - Updates to the JSEP and BUNDLE documents to the IESG as
>> Proposed
>>   Standard.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtcweb mailing list
>> rtcweb@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtcweb mailing list
>> rtcweb@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>>
>