IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] WGLC for draft-ietf-rtcweb-ip-handling

Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> Wed, 18 April 2018 21:08 UTC

Return-Path: <juberti@google.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 341F8126CD6 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 14:08:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2kF9lNR-1-er for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 14:08:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua0-x22b.google.com (mail-ua0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C37C126C3D for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 14:08:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id r16so2075267uak.11 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 14:08:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=csYP0mq7WIBEre8I6x3EqmGiAcE9EtY6Jc+5CIZI6u4=; b=ODFW97BwQ3cNJAuEw+oJD8RzcMwKbMZScLmVSegrw/M99Xsa2ZvhflRWhROxijEaJQ 7KMUxUK+Cnsw0IshC7qkAEp7jr7qqKSKiqONFdfZoEiDe6hjVOwxNBroFFX3KUj6rmgp +KDnU5kPNUEHngGxMmL3PB4rcaxu4LuLhp7lLJT6MoNSj59l8qb+lReFtygVYaRyN4NN Tz/n7gKWubo76SbNhwimnvDQHVNJSTTQwsONsq7pPVCPbvUHAUSoSbRrpnCKdbxPlYtV 17Rty0ttp4ebMGSxEQjyFq7xEna9xfnaCbOJZcqz/yzl+DgTlSrYRDgulUTt0/CBIOoU 9ytg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=csYP0mq7WIBEre8I6x3EqmGiAcE9EtY6Jc+5CIZI6u4=; b=U+TOLjESm9x7Kj8WrTzfaWJqaj2fK2pQHRysFfkkgKyzZylnt4DI3Y0Yntfs6Nn9dM sB2FVn+I0auIP/ffXoQbMs7t/E2IgO0e6tRD2YpXqTwvgOQ5j9qtuXS13qokKtt0KJry CHnLCtWVZkLgBWO2Xvk6Qc7dOPhmz9TVHZKJ9LspNuLxT4RxTGbIy8m6UaD+hnjqI542 mtdFVJL2q9D53VOqKaj4dWHZsAQbD54ZSKNW0A+sVlNPKYyQiWU2aWso1IZx8PR4bk6Z G2RvKCqVlJjEAXmHoRplMcCGQ46uehqOZrhhktLq9X9V/OdPiiPfiAN+KIXQNDEKT2cA guZQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tDpnXarOJir9c10QVe5t3opJSg6z83X5mjbqvtL2msvsXjw3OCt JzZ2gqJMBaFK3dvlPOw0ct2L9EQfp4x1X+8fZKjnVQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4+ZZXcaCRudCpaF4pfNzNPHdC8Z3KkNxLuJI0J5pera3XGnLjIgzoktHo2GLELshskMrr01cCTixxp+OWNuA4A=
X-Received: by 10.176.75.131 with SMTP id v3mr2767032uaf.108.1524085730078; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 14:08:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1D5B431C-801E-4F8C-8026-6BCBB72FF478@sn3rd.com> <63282b84-4493-3fcb-a95f-4afe17d96bb6@cs.tcd.ie> <CAOJ7v-1gTq+EEjb+-q-T-pABBW--rpNGegoj_d2_7f7AKGksCA@mail.gmail.com> <403713b4-31d4-9085-d639-d3f60935ed5a@cs.tcd.ie> <CAOJ7v-0ED-FK=JmSxBJYfM=PCdgY6kmbiq6aFLcP7OXugG07EA@mail.gmail.com> <e6938f7d-542d-736b-0a3d-9269d7dd06e5@cs.tcd.ie> <CAOW+2dv1ORz2tEkgDTvdM1DtgyOdgXqKU30T4QhLAp1NT+rirg@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-0tCcg3FdzyfSJ6Y3JaH-TivFf-Sey6+tD8BANJKsjqtQ@mail.gmail.com> <1fceb3c4-35f3-34f7-de1d-79d5805e6d22@gmail.com> <9517D601-D3E8-46E1-94E5-7EC29FD6319B@sn3rd.com> <b5d323ac-2205-2aee-05c9-f270e80215f5@gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-0+hr-NddbLCwgjkfyEFEzoLYW8BcE5OYZ+HUiqDRnarg@mail.gmail.com> <0dee004d-159a-a9be-a0b8-ecbfd4204d72@gmail.com> <06252a76-f12e-4d8d-4a07-5240a7605bce@gmail.com> <914e0220-e3cc-00d7-0925-e5deb8b07e75@nostrum.com> <AFDFD3F3-4798-4716-B26C-A67457BF2C65@sn3rd.com> <e5e2a517-d29a-117c-ab79-6f01fa62b843@gmail.com> <20180412144158.44733ac7@lminiero> <b767da79-7678-2a1c-ecb0-46a9a3bd9129@gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-2gmxpsGp=25pcJmnkYmipZdCFOqU4nLtAVSznLsZo9rQ@mail.gmail.com> <4902F7BF-0D20-4EA6-9E78-D22C90EFCE22@westhawk.co.uk> <CAOJ7v-3NsqD6pq-kkMw81+2n_D8qf558CKeCE76ZypyxwCgs9g@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-2NJ1vhVUerZ1cn8MP9hD_vgAYBurjeQKMx76Aa_U=n=Q@mail.gmail.com> <A8B32C11-30BD-4DA8-9BAB-FA26747BFF66@westhawk.co.uk> <CAOJ7v-0VNCjGdhtz56jwwksBcfPk=9wuxfMgwi8mq7ViFyWpuw@mail.gmail.com> <DDEE408B-B49E-465E-B17B-C2813AF4F2F4@westhawk.co.uk> <CAOJ7v-26f1hrujtegK6_U50E0MZPy5zmf0yDUWBY5oqrKQmGQg@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-2fn-SdR2VUbVVHbMB-_Rw9gV0nsRnc2Ace+682LBJBag@mail.gmail.com> <7E9CBD87-6C00-4CF8-AEDE-D2AEFC3213FA@westhawk.co.uk> <CAOJ7v-1sHcm46BCttHMNA4gjUTL98RwBRm-H1HGpF7Bwx2ceGA@mail.gmail.com> <03257894-7D79-463D-BC3A-5B388680A3E7@sn3rd.com>
In-Reply-To: <03257894-7D79-463D-BC3A-5B388680A3E7@sn3rd.com>
From: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 21:08:39 +0000
Message-ID: <CAOJ7v-3ycQH4Ho9OJsuYRR3M4GwsPGGkHzx=E0hKbFObSjRxkw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
Cc: RTCWeb IETF <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f4030436147c8d3742056a25dc6f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/2q4A-ZfEMa6FSkLgur_w4vxNZwk>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] WGLC for draft-ietf-rtcweb-ip-handling
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 21:08:54 -0000

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtcweb-ip-handling/07/

On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 1:20 PM Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> wrote:

> Yes please.  I think the IETF LC should be on the latest text.
>
> Note I’ve already updated the Shepherd write-up as Stephen suggested.
>
> spt
>
> > On Apr 18, 2018, at 03:16, Justin Uberti <juberti=
> 40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> >
> > OK, merged b) via https://github.com/juberti/draughts/pull/98.
> >
> > Sean, should I produce a new version of the document?
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 5:40 AM westhawk <thp@westhawk.co..uk> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On 16 Apr 2018, at 23:06, Justin Uberti <juberti=
> 40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Here's a specific and minimal proposal, which is a slight modification
> of Sean's proposal in https://github.com/juberti/draughts/pull/98/files:
> >>
> >> The details of this consent are left to the implementation; one
> potential mechanism is to tie this consent to getUserMedia consent.
> Alternatively implementations can provide a specific mechanism to obtain
> user consent where needed, e.g., when a VPN is in use.
> >>
> >> b) Sean's proposal (without the boldface)
> >
> > b)
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rtcweb mailing list
> > rtcweb@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
> > _______________________________________________
> > rtcweb mailing list
> > rtcweb@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email