IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Question about srtp_mki in DTLS/SRTP

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Wed, 14 January 2015 19:16 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6B1A1ACE90 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 11:16:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p5yg8kuXsvfq for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 11:16:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi0-x231.google.com (mail-oi0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2B321ACE8E for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 11:16:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi0-f49.google.com with SMTP id a141so8853918oig.8 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 11:16:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=9h9OCM5IkUIShw8TSnettoGOhhOekFfSq8PL6FQ/DhI=; b=mrZvzxtBYpg6sZbT3jsFJ/+bZtsY5H+bQRNYTutLJDUQ/wU5Mty/yGl1gq1/eEj9qK awAW4HzlbNATsSAFSmERbziUcRCDYH4JoHz1YdO/r9nzR9Rrvn15Q/g4V6FYnttCVRTZ DvWtK7LP6MORIZJyWSsz6h9Aicq9GM3nYebI2EH8jjyG0XoxoXba+NYj7SbT8YbnhQS3 1fQfjv9xKBYWfj/YG6mnp42VTa2pwyzDRXJ7mtwCFtBTc0JCgndqNVqxFouFf9FmPegh YUdPoZkYQ1XyPyRSs9nhjbxQ3Mc3EV1JUDnHxuirCPIRFHTu2jlIUA/fFETOGqOc+GBF jsig==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.202.79.149 with SMTP id d143mr3321912oib.16.1421262986116; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 11:16:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.202.226.136 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 11:16:26 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CANO7kWADQLXheo6mhgrEt-0XYwXHYbiq8=oOnOxOsqz4diw6nA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOW+2dvhEzAfyV51p1YWZoc41vih3TKhoArq3CGXzHvSdHEdcA@mail.gmail.com> <CANO7kWBjs4AwyTXXhOBSDqG=y9ThM=XkLyO_S1xPe3naL9za_Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAOW+2dt5k+dbxRbdodu5Sh+t6zzX0bVgXBUMnmSe+kJP2R+LLw@mail.gmail.com> <CANO7kWATfQdMapdCSDYdke+GFxh8OO6NJQob9hNQUDiASrpDtQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnV-irZn9N7WMTbvn4Vm1Ltqc7tzoCJo3_towfa6PSRwPw@mail.gmail.com> <CANO7kWADQLXheo6mhgrEt-0XYwXHYbiq8=oOnOxOsqz4diw6nA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 11:16:26 -0800
Message-ID: <CABkgnnW4pxL+rqF41b==wqHjMEP_7bKs_jJ4SXgGbyMpPP_rQg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Simon Perreault <sperreault@jive.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/2qCraSwjF42TDzqMVgOOLx4aMP8>
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Question about srtp_mki in DTLS/SRTP
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 19:16:29 -0000

On 14 January 2015 at 10:39, Simon Perreault <sperreault@jive.com> wrote:
> I don't disagree. At 50 packets per second you're good for 497 days without
> a rekey. Also, didn't renegotiation just get removed from TLS 1.3 or did I
> get that wrong?

Renegotiation is gone, but rekeying is going to be put back in.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email