IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Just browser-browser and browser-"gateway"? is this an RTCweb assumption?

Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Fri, 13 April 2012 11:59 UTC

Return-Path: <harald@alvestrand.no>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9695921F8763 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 04:59:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.100, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1i50wYDUtvwg for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 04:59:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no (eikenes.alvestrand.no [158.38.152.233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0854021F871E for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 04:59:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 434A039E0F3; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 13:59:32 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eikenes.alvestrand.no
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3WIVJC2o6FHa; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 13:59:31 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from hta-dell.lul.corp.google.com (62-20-124-50.customer.telia.com [62.20.124.50]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AE4E039E088; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 13:59:31 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4F881523.1080704@alvestrand.no>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 13:59:31 +0200
From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.28) Gecko/20120313 Thunderbird/3.1.20
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
References: <CALiegf=uDMycijcC+V6e+T0T8ZPkDvH1+TZS6rQ4BKXBU=+dJg@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxvgZS99CPYs8WkQGpbBFMff-ueFWpo6oENcD_2+LDEUKg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAD5OKxvgZS99CPYs8WkQGpbBFMff-ueFWpo6oENcD_2+LDEUKg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Just browser-browser and browser-"gateway"? is this an RTCweb assumption?
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 11:59:33 -0000

On 04/13/2012 01:39 PM, Roman Shpount wrote:
> What about browser to a media server? Does anybody want to do, for 
> instance, video upload from the browser to a video sharing site?
Not necessarily real-time, so may be out of scope for RTCWEB, but people 
are definitely interested.

For those who want to read about scenarios that don't necessarily 
involve real-time communication, but will most probably involve 
getUserMedia, I recommend this document:

https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/dap/raw-file/tip/media-stream-capture/scenarios.html

It's being used to drive requirements on the getUserMedia API in the W3C.

                      Harald

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email