Re: [rtcweb] Matthew's Objections: was Re: Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives

Lorenzo Miniero <lorenzo@meetecho.com> Wed, 11 December 2013 11:25 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@meetecho.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CDA71A1F7D for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 03:25:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.02
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.02 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_IT=0.635, HOST_EQ_IT=1.245, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lqaGdR09Ko5g for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 03:25:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpdg96.aruba.it (smtpdg5.aruba.it [62.149.158.235]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F9661AC4A7 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 03:25:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lminiero ([82.49.99.166]) by smtpcmd05.ad.aruba.it with bizsmtp id 0BRH1n00G3bPhp601BRHMJ; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 12:25:18 +0100
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 12:25:18 +0100
From: Lorenzo Miniero <lorenzo@meetecho.com>
To: "Chenxin (Xin)" <hangzhou.chenxin@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <20131211122518.69a97d04@lminiero>
In-Reply-To: <9E34D50A21D1D1489134B4D770CE0397680A3871@SZXEMA504-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <CA+9kkMBSpDLJBBbPxgyMUi+bi3aw3D8zpSXcAvQ4koi115QqBg@mail.gmail.com> <AE1A6B5FD507DC4FB3C5166F3A05A48441927F3A@TK5EX14MBXC295.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <52A6D092.3090701@ericsson.com> <AE1A6B5FD507DC4FB3C5166F3A05A484419289C7@TK5EX14MBXC295.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <AE1A6B5FD507DC4FB3C5166F3A05A48441928A32@TK5EX14MBXC295.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <52A79BCF.2090404@bbs.darktech.org> <AE1A6B5FD507DC4FB3C5166F3A05A48441928E45@TK5EX14MBXC295.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <9E34D50A21D1D1489134B4D770CE0397680A3871@SZXEMA504-MBX.china.huawei.com>
Organization: Meetecho
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.19; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Matthew's Objections: was Re: Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 11:25:29 -0000

Il giorno Wed, 11 Dec 2013 09:06:51 +0000
"Chenxin (Xin)" <hangzhou.chenxin@huawei.com> ha scritto:

<snip>

> 
> Second, At least, we could move the codec discussion to a separate
> mailing list like PNTAW. I need say sorry to Harald about it. I
> objected his same suggestion before because I believe we could get a
> result in plan. But now I find he was so wise. 

+1, that's what I was going to propose too. It is probably the only way
to be able to work on the other important RTCWEB stuff in here, while
keeping the video discussion going on.

Lorenzo