Re: [rtcweb] Making progress on the signaling discussion (NB: Action items enclosed!)

[Iñaki Baz Castillo <[e-mail]>]

2011/10/4 Ted Hardie <[e-mail]>:
> At today's Chairs call, Cullen, Magnus and I had a discussion of how to make
> progress on the signaling discussion.  We feel the mailing list discussion
> needs to have more concrete proposals in order to make progress, and so
> we're putting forward the following:
>
> 1) If you plan to put forward a draft proposing a concrete solution in this
> space, please send your name to the mailing list with that intent by October
> 7th *THIS FRIDAY*

Hi Ted, could you please explain what exactly are you looking for? a
concrete signaling mechanism within rtcweb? something native in
browsers? something carried by HTTP/WebSocket?

If so, I think that this should not be covered by rtcweb, which
instead should define a good API for dealing with SDP bodies (plain or
XML), create some kind of JavaScript object for mantaining each
session status and information (negotiated streams, codecs,
local/remote address...).

But for sure I miss something so I would like to know what exactly are
you looking for in your mail.

Thanks a lot.


-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<[e-mail]>