[rtcweb] #1: RFC 4734 citation

"rtcweb issue tracker" <trac+rtcweb@trac.tools.ietf.org> Mon, 22 October 2012 22:36 UTC

Return-Path: <trac+rtcweb@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E6DE11E808D for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 15:36:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sd+wa4WIuYZ9 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 15:36:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from grenache.tools.ietf.org (grenache.tools.ietf.org []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E619D11E80AD for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 15:36:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([]:52941 helo=grenache.tools.ietf.org ident=www-data) by grenache.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from <trac+rtcweb@trac.tools.ietf.org>) id 1TQQbW-00057U-F6; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 00:36:14 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: rtcweb issue tracker <trac+rtcweb@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Version: 0.12.2
Precedence: bulk
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.2, by Edgewall Software
To: jmvalin@jmvalin.ca, bernard_aboba@hotmail.com
X-Trac-Project: rtcweb
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 22:36:14 -0000
X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/rtcweb/
X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/rtcweb/trac/ticket/1
Message-ID: <066.ee8d274029b0215df9ff464ea44b5fe7@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: jmvalin@jmvalin.ca, bernard_aboba@hotmail.com, rtcweb@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+rtcweb@trac.tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on grenache.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 01:27:04 -0700
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: [rtcweb] #1: RFC 4734 citation
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 22:36:31 -0000

#1: RFC 4734 citation

 Section 3 states:

    WebRTC clients are REQUIRED to implement the following audio codecs.

    o  Opus [RFC6716], with any ptime value up to 120 ms

    o  G.711 PCMA and PCMU with one channel, a rate of 8000 Hz and a
       ptime of 20 - see section 4.5.14 of [RFC3551]

    o  Telephone Event - [RFC4734]

 [BA] I believe the citation should be to "RTP Payload for DTMF Digits,
 Telephony Tones, and Telephony Signals" [RFC4733], not to "Definition of
 Events for Modem, Fax, and Text Telephony Signals" [RFC4734].

 If the desire is in fact to mandate support for RFC 4734, please explain
 why it is necessary for browsers to include support for digital encoding
 of modem and fax signals.

 Reporter:  bernard_aboba@…     |      Owner:  jmvalin@…
     Type:  defect              |     Status:  new
 Priority:  critical            |  Milestone:  milestone1
Component:  audio               |    Version:  1.0
 Severity:  Active WG Document  |   Keywords:

Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/rtcweb/trac/ticket/1>
rtcweb <http://tools.ietf.org/rtcweb/>