Re: [rtcweb] #7: Section 4.2.4

"rtcweb issue tracker" <trac+rtcweb@trac.tools.ietf.org> Sun, 17 February 2013 17:20 UTC

Return-Path: <trac+rtcweb@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1868921F8B0A for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 09:20:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nJJH+NZcjA+4 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 09:20:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from grenache.tools.ietf.org (grenache.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:1:2::30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B440521F8B02 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 09:20:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49817 helo=grenache.tools.ietf.org ident=www-data) by grenache.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <trac+rtcweb@trac.tools.ietf.org>) id 1U77uS-00077A-Rg; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 18:20:16 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: rtcweb issue tracker <trac+rtcweb@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3
Precedence: bulk
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software
To: draft-ietf-rtcweb-security@tools.ietf.org, bernard_aboba@hotmail.com
X-Trac-Project: rtcweb
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 17:20:16 -0000
X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/rtcweb/
X-Trac-Ticket-URL: https://wiki.tools.ietf.org/wg/rtcweb/trac/ticket/7#comment:1
Message-ID: <081.0042adf7cbed346b70808581b635e7e7@trac.tools.ietf.org>
References: <066.fc74cc9e303cee5e79f5a36c781ab55a@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 7
In-Reply-To: <066.fc74cc9e303cee5e79f5a36c781ab55a@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-rtcweb-security@tools.ietf.org, bernard_aboba@hotmail.com, rtcweb@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+rtcweb@trac.tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on grenache.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Resent-To: ekr@rtfm.com
Resent-Message-Id: <20130217172020.B440521F8B02@ietfa.amsl.com>
Resent-Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 09:20:20 -0800
Resent-From: trac+rtcweb@trac.tools.ietf.org
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] #7: Section 4.2.4
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 17:20:22 -0000

#7: Section 4.2.4


Comment (by bernard_aboba@hotmail.com):

 Section 5.4 of the Security-Arch document mentions ToR.  Does it make
 sense to move some of that material to Section 4.1 of this document?

-- 
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
 Reporter:                           |       Owner:  draft-ietf-rtcweb-
  bernard_aboba@hotmail.com          |  security@tools.ietf.org
     Type:  defect                   |      Status:  new
 Priority:  minor                    |   Milestone:  milestone1
Component:  security                 |     Version:  1.0
 Severity:  In WG Last Call          |  Resolution:
 Keywords:                           |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Ticket URL: <https://wiki.tools.ietf.org/wg/rtcweb/trac/ticket/7#comment:1>
rtcweb <http://tools.ietf.org/rtcweb/>