Re: [rtcweb] Text proposal for CNAME in draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Wed, 16 April 2014 23:27 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 006061A0412 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 16:27:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LdANVKO2Rkol for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 16:27:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-x22a.google.com (mail-wg0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AE301A040F for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 16:27:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f42.google.com with SMTP id y10so11430699wgg.1 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 16:27:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=TWJ2I47KpVjGOjzuCC1yV1DJ8D1HywXuuguf00CPoac=; b=uMIT0dCLJyPZ043SdXvHyKxjoGB3qIEBwR0P9kv8UjSo2aXbRkvyE9BaD7hSGJH7QG XHYXeqM59BNwySYx9dgAw55J4iBr9Bl+MeKt1xbHhfEU2yMz0pkYFvM5uYMP8Bw7ETGo d6VEoxL8NjUcHgs0LBf8psXk0d1XICT3jKj+71vlbUS9EyKAw1U1q/W2eA7R1rKpzDXK XiNbJf/b7AkghbdeGEVkSshldJjNQzhw3TyYEfPp03Ealgro3WNjQRBZYcW2h4Pmoh8i aVZoeqp3sIo/t+EO2TMfelVf6sOOHWe8u5I9Up6UUyr7aDseAFqgbh+jCfULQ252fowX 94LQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.82.133 with SMTP id i5mr21490588wiy.50.1397690822386; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 16:27:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.227.144.132 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 16:27:02 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <534E7D83.3010608@ericsson.com>
References: <533E76AC.7030003@ericsson.com> <CABkgnnVD09V80OkXY=ZKicYhjBMR8XZMFYCXrMmHMkVWE7mwVw@mail.gmail.com> <005B30AC-F891-481E-A25A-D3705713F1D3@csperkins.org> <CABkgnnUSpeL8fv=7gRmM+QSYvFgd16r_2cP6J066DL+dkydrCg@mail.gmail.com> <534284B7.7010103@ericsson.com> <534D21C2.20300@ericsson.com> <CABkgnnWC9SCFbRqvnEkciqfHtwv6j48cLP0JeE4DfhH6cqToSw@mail.gmail.com> <534E7D83.3010608@ericsson.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 16:27:02 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVhS8SQKWe69pm+a8o-cqMb5aPy5DKDQv=iVaRLaQtaqA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/3_QGyYao8brfm6gXTw6sVZFtlE0
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Text proposal for CNAME in draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 23:27:11 -0000

On 16 April 2014 05:54, Magnus Westerlund
<magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> wrote:
> Is this better/acceptable?

Better, but I don't think that the proposed solution is sufficient for
some use cases.  There is no downside to enabling correlation of
sessions when the signaling entity is able to force correlation.  Let
the app set CNAME.