IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Plan

"Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com> Fri, 13 September 2013 19:03 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9464121F8488 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 12:03:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IPFeOtPoaF7i for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 12:03:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83C9E21F8423 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 12:03:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=448; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1379099005; x=1380308605; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=/b5/Adr0C6wiDOok1yleJv6t7wAY9JE3dJdjAagkQ7I=; b=MqdwEqBPxIjxNx/PXcIAw8kv4wNQskRcbBBrYMCwQNJOXJPIvZwFqLsQ 5Gle2Ezb/262fyw7d2Rw0GWNfk0ZmHQYvVymuCe3nOr0fOCyDU4p3Hg7D iuACkzvbecUH9xxj8ThUoGoKeZ0/xkLwe8Garr15NpGfUuoJnjVAir0og c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AkcFAPZgM1KtJV2Z/2dsb2JhbABbgweBCoJjvhiBHBZ0giUBAQEDAXkFCwIBCCIkMiUCBA4FCId1BrlHjz4CMQeDHoEAA4kAoG6DJIIq
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.90,899,1371081600"; d="scan'208";a="259299543"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 13 Sep 2013 19:03:25 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x06.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x06.cisco.com [173.36.12.80]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r8DJ3PA8007678 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 13 Sep 2013 19:03:25 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com ([169.254.5.15]) by xhc-aln-x06.cisco.com ([173.36.12.80]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 14:03:24 -0500
From: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>
To: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Plan
Thread-Index: AQHOsLPruYV95TlmRkqxvkC4jw2kPg==
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 19:03:24 +0000
Message-ID: <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB1166A9750@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
References: <CA+9kkMAvdtq_gufKmDNCNCL+kKcxyi0MGUoVHetd9_DzbEdEnA@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfk1rArkDGx6_3NaiKuSVe7udcHSBrotg51ctH-dc2PpsA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALiegfk1rArkDGx6_3NaiKuSVe7udcHSBrotg51ctH-dc2PpsA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.20.249.164]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <678266118F29544B8023D2A71CE45B0A@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Plan
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 19:03:55 -0000

That topic was discussed between W3C and IETF when forming the two WG and very clear decisions was made that the W3C would not make that decision. Part of the reasons had to do with the history of a very similar argument at W3C around the video tag. 

On Sep 13, 2013, at 11:21 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> wrote:

> Do not take me wrong, but IMHO this decision should be taken by the W3C WebRTC group.
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email