MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAJrXDUHjsxOKQHkOAHiVeLvkDXjZ8_UbMACej_44imxQ1_6FYg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJrXDUHjsxOKQHkOAHiVeLvkDXjZ8_UbMACej_44imxQ1_6FYg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 10:51:59 +0800
Message-ID: <CAHgZEq6T-6RwUSD3y3OEN8mWGY=G1LD23wCoTUUX3mYWKHh2_g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alexandre GOUAILLARD <agouaillard@gmail.com>
To: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013a100af5882a04e06a4fba
Cc: "<rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Request for input from WebRTC JS (web app) developers
 (please respond if you are *using* the API)
Precedence: list

--089e013a100af5882a04e06a4fba
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

thanks for the effort.
I think it goes in the right direction.
I filled my part.

regards,

alex.


On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>wrote:

> I don't know if this has been done already, but I think that the WG could
> really use come good feedback from the JS developers out there actually
> using the WebRTC API.  What are you making?  What's working well? What's
> not working well?  Do you like SDP?  (Try to be constructive with that last
> one).
>
> So, I made a little spreadsheet where you can leave feedback:
>
>
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AuaKXw3SkHMSdHlZdV9RN0xSWFhybVl4anJLRkVPV0E#gid=0
>
> If you are a JS developer using the WebRTC API, would you please fill in
> some feedback?  If you can't give details about what you're working on, I
> can understand that.  But please give us a sense of what is working well
> and what isn't.  I think it would help the WG a lot.  But please do
> remember  that the WG is focusing on getting 1.0 out the door and probably
> wants to hear something more constructive than "I hate it; start over", so
> try to be constructive, especially when talking about SDP.
>
> Speaking of SDP, I read through 190+ recent emails about SDP (yeah... hot
> topic!) and collected quotes from some of you and put them in the
> spreadsheet.  If you don't like that, I apologize; please let me know, or
> just remove yourself from the doc.  I wanted to do the same for the other
> questions, but found it too hard.  So I hope you'll help me :).
>
> (I didn't include anyone from Google, Mozilla, or Microsoft;  I wanted
> this to be feedback for developers, not implementors, even if the
> implementors are also developers;  And I didn't include myself :)
>
> Thank you so much for your feedback!
>
>
>
>
> PS: if anyone is interested, my quick tally of opinions of SDP indicate:
>
> Like: 3
> Strongly Dislike: 6
> Would like something else, or at least discussion of something else: 5
>
> I may have gotten some wrong, so please give feedback to help it be more
> accurate.
>
> Thanks again!
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>
>

--089e013a100af5882a04e06a4fba
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">thanks for the effort.<div>I think it goes in the right di=
rection.</div><div>I filled my part.</div><div><br></div><div>regards,</div=
><div><br></div><div>alex.</div></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><br><d=
iv class=3D"gmail_quote">
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Peter Thatcher <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a hr=
ef=3D"mailto:pthatcher@google.com" target=3D"_blank">pthatcher@google.com</=
a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0=
 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir=3D"ltr">I don&#39;t know if this has been done already, but I thin=
k that the WG could really use come good feedback from the JS developers ou=
t there actually using the WebRTC API. =A0What are you making? =A0What&#39;=
s working well? What&#39;s not working well? =A0Do you like SDP? =A0(Try to=
 be constructive with that last one).<div>


<br></div><div>So, I made a little spreadsheet where you can leave feedback=
:</div><div><br></div><div><a href=3D"https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/c=
cc?key=3D0AuaKXw3SkHMSdHlZdV9RN0xSWFhybVl4anJLRkVPV0E#gid=3D0" target=3D"_b=
lank">https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=3D0AuaKXw3SkHMSdHlZdV9RN0=
xSWFhybVl4anJLRkVPV0E#gid=3D0</a><br>


</div><div><br></div><div>If you are a JS developer using the WebRTC API, w=
ould you please fill in some feedback? =A0If you can&#39;t give details abo=
ut what you&#39;re working on, I can understand that. =A0But please give us=
 a sense of what is working well and what isn&#39;t. =A0I think it would he=
lp the WG a lot. =A0But please do remember =A0that the WG is focusing on ge=
tting 1.0 out the door and probably wants to hear something more constructi=
ve than &quot;I hate it; start over&quot;, so try to be constructive, espec=
ially when talking about SDP.</div>


<div><br></div><div>Speaking of SDP, I read through 190+ recent emails abou=
t SDP (yeah... hot topic!) and collected quotes from some of you and put th=
em in the spreadsheet. =A0If you don&#39;t like that, I apologize; please l=
et me know, or just remove yourself from the doc. =A0I wanted to do the sam=
e for the other questions, but found it too hard. =A0So I hope you&#39;ll h=
elp me :).</div>


<div><br></div><div>(I didn&#39;t include anyone from Google, Mozilla, or M=
icrosoft; =A0I wanted this to be feedback for developers, not implementors,=
 even if the implementors are also developers; =A0And I didn&#39;t include =
myself :)<br>


</div><div><br></div><div>Thank you so much for your feedback!=A0</div><div=
><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>PS: if anyone =
is interested, my quick tally of opinions of SDP indicate:<br></div><div>


<br></div><div>Like: 3</div><div>Strongly Dislike: 6</div><div>Would like s=
omething else, or at least discussion of something else: 5</div><div><br></=
div><div>I may have gotten some wrong, so please give feedback to help it b=
e more accurate.</div>


<div><br></div><div>Thanks again!</div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
rtcweb mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org">rtcweb@ietf.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb" target=3D"_blank">=
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>

--089e013a100af5882a04e06a4fba--