Re: [rtcweb] Is rtcweb the right place for draft-ietf-rtcweb-mdns-ice-candidates?

Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> Thu, 04 July 2019 00:28 UTC

Return-Path: <juberti@google.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED9B01200D7 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 17:28:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Oqn967YXKu0k for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 17:28:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe2d.google.com (mail-vs1-xe2d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5BFF12007C for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 17:28:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe2d.google.com with SMTP id m23so940658vso.1 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 03 Jul 2019 17:28:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=mEYbBio/y/jgTb9nJeY0a8NvQBHHAvMKgOY2I5Bgb2M=; b=E/julHYBoUAPjpSRAp0sqXiSXs/sz33u8R5wgAWaskeOPDSCKM/Tp/DaQLdo3Ozws9 deUO9QLpOYFBs3Zuu2NlCEExbaJdwJnl2Hv7SqODQsg1Rly2/Mn76WLKqRstV49STITA EvQT9KWaGcD771MBq6ZsLJKX4lAaCIct0Mye92UNYI+G+MoD0tzbTi+7tNrTQCRxMq4s 6CD3rEiHHg5n4og0pZ0clG0Z0VnTiX6+1GLhjAUM+gHATSSl/Nv/HuaMEZf+YevaIM9N a9lCsgGTQqhFWR98MKFfI7MqeXQlBmvSInp9kR+ksH+gYNr+BRqSTCCwxQ7ajHrEZPbu Z7gw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=mEYbBio/y/jgTb9nJeY0a8NvQBHHAvMKgOY2I5Bgb2M=; b=egHzsLd4GLuz4p7x5nzuQa+prO02VqBWGe5kdRLOrT4+ErYr59CGf8M64yPFqWkHM3 1+6+RytoMu3Pbtb4U7Qvw2sRfTlwXFbEZIPy0F2etXG8poRGQH9oV1d+Ko5IuDNiMqe/ tYeEjef9/lAQO4eDnotx0fYgUcgMFFLnT7s8psLybvos+eOKCcfoyjCowYORhGGxZ8+f zCivQOavJZZAPV9BlYUwdWC7vH1Wu4UqnltgHlF5FLWkBQN0YdFBRqMPylUQp4j4EfRN 0mfqywnq1BK7xHKCyVQSMc7xACQuKXzUrFhCsThE/fe43RZ3VYARz4tQzuHk7Vk6VRxT e2Sg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXsra+GgPdxF7PLXg1if3F1Vq2tcGHkWBP62H4hdo4U+PSY69e8 dmhENicXVP05qmAiaF3xS/l6U+Y/3Udx9yBbkptPJIgW2bE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwngLW0/g9LMDI7iXhh3EuElrKcAEnaO3oUHxyJfOZdCpOwgHUSbqBU/DSJlgqvGCf1OXftomp287mlF3S/BFs=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:eb19:: with SMTP id a25mr19470590vso.109.1562200120172; Wed, 03 Jul 2019 17:28:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <b03853a4-1006-4da0-d52f-9e7462a2cd0c@alvestrand.no> <D80CECAF-B520-40A2-BFBB-E39B73BA943D@sn3rd.com> <CAD5OKxsd-SE8VpwFgto3DLbabs+9O+cHMucy1+Cep7tCJQR6+w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAD5OKxsd-SE8VpwFgto3DLbabs+9O+cHMucy1+Cep7tCJQR6+w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2019 17:28:28 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOJ7v-2XrND6YWqo2tEiDbs7TZpEoiP+MGBAk2aF7hfoMiGk0Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003be503058cd00f98"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/4H7q3GY6unWymou1jbKPTukpUHI>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Is rtcweb the right place for draft-ietf-rtcweb-mdns-ice-candidates?
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2019 00:28:44 -0000

The problem this draft is trying to solve is fairly RTCWEB-specific. If
there are individual issues to resolve, we can send them out to mmusic for
discussion, but AFAIK no changes to existing ICE specs are needed.

On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 4:26 PM Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> Is rtcweb the right place for draft-ietf-rtcweb-mdns-ice-candidates? This
> entire draft seems to be ICE/SDP specific and not limited to rtcweb. Also,
> there are significant interop implications for this draft between browser
> and non-browser end points which probably warrant larger discussion outside
> of rtcweb group. I would think mmusic would be a much better place for this
> draft. I know there is an incentive to complete this draft quickly but this
> has a potential to break a lot of things (it already did break interop with
> almost every existing ICE implementation).
>
> Regards,
> _____________
> Roman Shpount
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>