Re: [rtcweb] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-13

Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> Wed, 14 May 2014 07:21 UTC

Return-Path: <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C087F1A0273 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 May 2014 00:21:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LCNokaBT3kxi for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 May 2014 00:21:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sessmg22.ericsson.net (sessmg22.ericsson.net [193.180.251.58]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 038E01A0271 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 May 2014 00:21:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3a-f79a86d0000010e9-b2-5373197aefea
Received: from ESESSHC014.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by sessmg22.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 5F.45.04329.A7913735; Wed, 14 May 2014 09:21:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.62) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.174.1; Wed, 14 May 2014 09:21:30 +0200
Message-ID: <53731974.4030209@ericsson.com>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 09:21:24 +0200
From: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>, Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
References: <CA+9kkMCeoA27gOw=6+oESFGptDrXYpXeux7yjBByHaApp7=-YA@mail.gmail.com> <042901cf6d21$82133940$8639abc0$@gmail.com> <271EFE91-DA13-4863-B45B-46E2032E217F@csperkins.org>
In-Reply-To: <271EFE91-DA13-4863-B45B-46E2032E217F@csperkins.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFtrNLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+JvjW6VZHGwQf9bU4vlL08wWvxtZ7ZY +6+d3YHZY9r9+2weO2fdZfdYsuQnUwBzFJdNSmpOZllqkb5dAlfGgklbWQp+cVcsOniUrYFx E2cXIyeHhICJRNe72awQtpjEhXvr2boYuTiEBI4ySsxuvs4E4SxnlGjbcgWsildAW+JSw1Ym EJtFQFVi39kJbCA2m4CFxM0fjWC2qECwxIaHf9kh6gUlTs58wgJiiwh4Slz5cArMZhYQlXj1 cAoziC0sECCxp/8qC8SyjYwSr7r7wZo5BRwlHi5+C1TEAXSeuERPYxBEr4HEkUVzWCFseYnm rbPB5ggB3dbQ1ME6gVFoFpLVs5C0zELSsoCReRWjaHFqcXFuupGRXmpRZnJxcX6eXl5qySZG YGgf3PLbagfjweeOhxgFOBiVeHgXxBYFC7EmlhVX5h5ilOZgURLnnbTIPVhIID2xJDU7NbUg tSi+qDQntfgQIxMHp1QDY6KbFNeBHClP1id/180Q0D29aE9mwxvpx0yd6Xtkp2SfSZBm8xE8 o+G7bbbCYUWnw8v/Ki+89/dqcE+H86kZu8v/rw1Pvla9u5plx5anoSdrmTwfJkcrTC5XOsV1 zOmV411/lq+aM0rLXy55urZu5dSdjnM5vT2SBcWWXlXQ+ji74rrv0++90kosxRmJhlrMRcWJ ALHnCudOAgAA
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/4JoVDmQwTPzZoBErz_vNgyXA06Y
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-13
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 07:21:40 -0000

On 2014-05-14 00:06, Colin Perkins wrote:
> Hi Roni,
> 
> On 11 May 2014, at 15:01, Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Just nits
>> 
>> 1.       Section 8 last paragraph “RTP XR” should be “RTCP XR”
>> 
>> 2.       The last sentence in the paragraph after figure 1 “it it
>> believed”
>> 
>> 3.       In section 12.2.2 bullet 4 “While is is clearly”.
> 
> Fixed, thanks.
> 
>> BTW: this case can be a self-view in the mixer case which may be a
>> feature and not a bug. It may also be a loop-back.
> 
> In cases where the loop-back/self-view is desired, won’t a different
> SSRC be used to distinguish from an accidental loop?
> 

First of all I expect a self-view to simply take the local
mediaStreamTrack and display that, rather than loop it through the RTP
mixer.

If this occurs deliberately, to get it to work it will need to be
provided as a MST that the mixer offer the WebRTC endpoint, thus
originates deliberately under its own SSRC. See discussion of media
forwarding in Section 12.1.2.

Cheers

Magnus Westerlund

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Services, Media and Network features, Ericsson Research EAB/TXM
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ericsson AB                 | Phone  +46 10 7148287
Färögatan 6                 | Mobile +46 73 0949079
SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------