Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' opinions of the current WebRTC API and SDP as a control surface

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Thu, 18 July 2013 16:53 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B36011E80FD for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 09:53:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.239
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.239 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.361, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2qD4DZA+gm1c for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 09:53:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-x231.google.com (mail-wg0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::231]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7950721E8088 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 09:53:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id a12so3056659wgh.4 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 09:53:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=j2XOLbZHGYRWI2evhz0jyCmZE6dOh2DhlD6DSFnwv+c=; b=fnT9RKLClb8XJE115J9Lz2ktqGZb2C777dOmWgOzPXU+X9WWQCHXqsaulU87oFdzAF 0SS7Oq7w6obe64EqZNBw/zhRRE6cVKsUADo7kQBBwWmr5n55AWZf5AOWGZk+J/sr8a+C Ycj6DWJrvVlUPrsau8fFJhlWSdni6AEgGky//MrIp3eqQeLVfPS+CCIrvHyw6zN8zEMX ZRRFyEP8yG48TShrM2FE7fFmrWRetZEmuCKtqwZ4/83Ig2FY4zQJDr45aEF8El+rMhmO Ea95C5+S+6TwEBrduUOyNZyzoxeBignaeXJfe8flhYNc94PZjbS4dVpTFcItSB/2siJQ Waxw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.211.106 with SMTP id nb10mr8804703wic.14.1374166427607; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 09:53:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.60.46 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 09:53:47 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAJrXDUHHVfyE2bCaQu3pR4F=XHvEp64xMwwdRy586FkrOjO3dw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJrXDUGMohpBdi-ft-o_uE7ewFkw7wRY9x7gYEncjov7qi-Bew@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBPa4wBS8pYq=0wesMOfL6TkeC7QGAZ8pWwOcnkhkJqWfA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUFxo8P8wxh8jX3019yPQOuwQ0eVdsFmRXsbWdWinnc5oA@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBOTKpmFC34waqZ4kA-P8t+E6yY9gX1JFCHhsBH0+CF-Qw@mail.gmail.com> <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C30BC0F@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAD5OKxtKLMf_d=8GSMrqfNhDHPe9MFP2ZTKzZHFn9CyMr-gSVQ@mail.gmail.com> <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C30C833@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAD5OKxvGfkgRp6tXwbOu_kVteHiBBqsyR5ixH18FMKjCNGO8VQ@mail.gmail.com> <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C30CD1E@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <BLU401-EAS386F88B3FE140492B39B59693610@phx.gbl> <AE1A6B5FD507DC4FB3C5166F3A05A484213E41E7@TK5EX14MBXC265.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <CAJrXDUHHVfyE2bCaQu3pR4F=XHvEp64xMwwdRy586FkrOjO3dw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 09:53:47 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXE3mzb=TmiMBWGPwux2vZo3VL14yrQLyPT72hs74b1JA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: "<rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' opinions of the current WebRTC API and SDP as a control surface
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 16:53:52 -0000

On 18 July 2013 08:12, Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>; wrote:
> I believe I began paying attention to the mailing lists after you sent out
> theses slides that you didn't present.  I'm interested in seeing them, and
> while I could dig through archives to find them, if convenient, could you
> please give me a link to the slides?  Thanks.

It wasn't actually November, it was October, which made this harder to
find than I had expected.

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webrtc/2012Oct/0148.html