IETF Logo Mail Archive

[rtcweb] Some misunderstandings about <Usecase & architecture: Browser application with separate webserver & voipserver>

Nguyen Duong Tuan <hoang.su.tk@gmail.com> Thu, 18 August 2011 02:09 UTC

Return-Path: <hoang.su.tk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4668421F8ADC for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 19:09:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GgTa+GT9lbIS for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 19:09:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vx0-f172.google.com (mail-vx0-f172.google.com [209.85.220.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B79A21F8AD8 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 19:09:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vxi29 with SMTP id 29so1666275vxi.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 19:10:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=vHRz0Eu3ExJLg8PQyDpqarscZX2KfehDHub3nh/gWCc=; b=ujOLj+akBch3Eg3ubxTFyxsoDNqg0Ueh8A+4oAUcZs2SrVU/oggBwfz+OlPNVi5+hZ 9+LEUftNhrtZoWZAFEulUUnp2tvxT6Xfnpgr9jnX4g8szDbFyp78/jnUkJS2ZrFQCvlp vFpSOEAKj89X0FulFPgEPY7cJcppishzjDhtI=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.93.11 with SMTP id cq11mr164204vdb.80.1313633409232; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 19:10:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.182.132 with HTTP; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 19:10:09 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 11:10:09 +0900
Message-ID: <CAM_kxqci51=BnUFe-67Qs4eCxtGY50HDsRPrLjYULnBZJoH0Ow@mail.gmail.com>
From: Nguyen Duong Tuan <hoang.su.tk@gmail.com>
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 08:13:52 -0700
Subject: [rtcweb] Some misunderstandings about <Usecase & architecture: Browser application with separate webserver & voipserver>
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 02:21:34 -0000

Hello everyone,

I read about Partha's question at RTCWeb mailing list at
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg00563.html

He said that there's interoprating issues due to mapping between
RTCWebserver and SIP client w.r.t mid-call services in the
introduction of new gateway. Could anyone please explain more about
those issues? I have a little bit difficult to understand his
meanings.

I couldn't send an email to Partha directly by partr@cisco.com, so I
decided to send to this email. Sorry for any inconvenience.

Thanks,
TuanND

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email