IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] draft-roach-mmusic-unified-plan-00 expired

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Mon, 20 January 2014 04:24 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9616F1A0033 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 20:24:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.169
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.169 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD=0.981, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QISRQYwblFnV for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 20:24:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailgw1.ericsson.se (mailgw1.ericsson.se [193.180.251.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A24A11A0032 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 20:24:32 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-b7f1c8e000005ceb-51-52dca4ff6b27
Received: from ESESSHC015.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by mailgw1.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id F4.87.23787.FF4ACD25; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 05:24:32 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.114]) by ESESSHC015.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.63]) with mapi id 14.02.0387.000; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 05:24:31 +0100
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] draft-roach-mmusic-unified-plan-00 expired
Thread-Index: AQHPFKgpqGn0rdJS60yb4Ymh81EsUZqL8uFRgAAGa4CAAQxq5g==
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 04:24:30 +0000
Message-ID: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D10819E@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
References: <CALiegfkJe1QfMcPoDg4+71oujHUzJy86_pnLXDO9C=g_v8_4Lg@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D107730@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>, <CALiegfkhs5JeVj-2YL2QJgwMgB1cP77aUZEWdoywQCpQd_O6Ag@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALiegfkhs5JeVj-2YL2QJgwMgB1cP77aUZEWdoywQCpQd_O6Ag@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D10819EESESSMB209erics_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrCLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+JvjS7D0jtBBpv+cVhM32djsfZfO7sD k8e5hvfsHkuW/GQKYIrisklJzcksSy3St0vgyjj4XKXgkHFF/7XrzA2MLUZdjJwcEgImEstm X2CBsMUkLtxbz9bFyMUhJHCIUeLv1m9MIAkhgSWMEqvWV3YxcnCwCVhIdP/TBgmLCNhI/Ltw gR3EZhZQl7iz+ByYLSzgIHHl1mkmiBpHidetl9khbCeJN5PfgdksAqoSzS0tYHt5BXwlTv9Y xAqx6iajxI33jCA2p0CgxK+pb5lBbEag276fWsMEsUtc4taT+UwQNwtILNlznhnCFpV4+fgf K0RNvsSqy3OZIOYLSpyc+YRlAqPILCTts5CUzUJSNgvoS2YBTYn1u/QhShQlpnQ/ZIewNSRa 58xlRxZfwMi+ipE9NzEzJ73ccBMjMGYObvmtu4Px1DmRQ4zSHCxK4rwf3joHCQmkJ5akZqem FqQWxReV5qQWH2Jk4uCUamAM1oyR68ibHXWj829x4BNlm8WvNzM+zHI7+ONP7Z8bF5fsjHLd c+T4w7KafULm9XetJ4SZTuastkhSmLLx66H9djPuubNmt95+o3Mz9J7Dn0L3uZ9enFVcdtV9 Q9me2vSOFsF97wM8ZI0kVU+EHJn63+vXYTWJnAOXv8Y4d38sO1XXrBmS+2WTEktxRqKhFnNR cSIAFtVtcGcCAAA=
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] draft-roach-mmusic-unified-plan-00 expired
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 04:24:34 -0000

Hi,

I can’t comment on what people implement, but the specifications of some UP features, e.g. the partial offer/answer mechanism, are not ready, so they can’t be implemented yet.

Regards,

Christer


Sent from Windows Mail

From: Iñaki Baz Castillo<mailto:ibc@aliax.net>
Sent: ‎Sunday‎, ‎January‎ ‎19‎, ‎2014 ‎3‎:‎24‎ ‎PM
To: Christer Holmberg<mailto:christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org<mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>

2014/1/19 Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>:
> My understanding is that the draft was never intended to progress. Once we
> decide that the UP is the road to fame and glory, the different parts would
> be defined in different drafts (in many cases also in different WGs).
>
> Having said that, maybe it would be a good idea to keep the draft alive
> until we have actually finished the work above.

And why no one browser or WebRTC device implements it yet? Do we
understand the impact of changing from
_whatever_sdp_browsers_are_using_today_ to Unified Plan?



--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email