Re: [rtcweb] The MTI Codec Questions (what to ask and how to ask them)

[Randell Jesup <[e-mail]>]

On 11/5/2014 5:39 PM, tim panton wrote:
>
> Agreed, the worst aspect of any adoption of H264 is that it makes it 
> significantly more difficult to
> produce a custom ’secure’ build of firefox that has been independently 
> reviewed for special use-cases
> (press, humanitarian workers etc). I suspect those users might be 
> prepared to forego the ‘w3c webRTC compliant’
> logo in exchange for increased security.

I'll note that we're running openH264 inside a pretty strong sandbox for 
security reasons, so really one should be vetting the sandbox and 
assuming the code inside is compromised. The sandbox exposes a lot less 
than an NPAPI plugin exposes, for example. Perhaps this helps for your case.

-- 
Randell Jesup -- rjesup a t mozilla d o t com