Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process

Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com> Sat, 23 November 2013 01:44 UTC

Return-Path: <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5C4F1AE16B for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 17:44:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.425
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.425 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.525, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8XyWm3sLUMBo for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 17:44:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from blu0-omc3-s11.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc3-s11.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.116.86]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD5FB1AE0E2 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 17:44:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from BLU403-EAS326 ([65.55.116.72]) by blu0-omc3-s11.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 22 Nov 2013 17:44:23 -0800
X-TMN: [q34Xo1GMFVrS6VFfkZWT/e3U+OUBDrnt]
X-Originating-Email: [bernard_aboba@hotmail.com]
Message-ID: <BLU403-EAS326D90D1BD88B11E089D9AC93E30@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
References: <528E39F4.4010706@ericsson.com> <528E5057.30408@stpeter.im> <F89641F6-BC91-4BF2-89CB-26F5C187A66A@apple.com> <528E7033.2090502@gmail.com> <528F68CC.40106@usdonovans.com> <8uru89ha1p0cccvq5qr8mtcnl4mvmkelhk@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de> <CAPvvaaJdcDUZ=x0G_zAuEVihGB_u3Ly=OoVfh6Mq8f4iSFhzCg@mail.gmail.com> <528F7E21.7010803@librevideo.org> <CAPvvaaLpFVU-hpGO6OK7CB=5mcO4cZvdtZjWwy17O6pQLBnS2g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <CAPvvaaLpFVU-hpGO6OK7CB=5mcO4cZvdtZjWwy17O6pQLBnS2g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 17:44:18 -0800
To: Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Nov 2013 01:44:23.0050 (UTC) FILETIME=[88E816A0:01CEE7ED]
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 01:44:31 -0000

> On Nov 22, 2013, at 8:20 AM, "Emil Ivov" <emcho@jitsi.org>; said:
> 
> If we can't reach consensus then we are in no position to mandate.

[BA] It strikes me that once we venture beyond consensus and running code into voting, we have left our home behind for someplace else whose principles should at the least be articulated.

For example, it would be helpful to understand whether we are now endorsing Kings and if so, whether the model is that of a constitutional monarchy, or more along the Absolutist line. 

we could decide to emulate Louis XIV (a defender of The Divine Right of Kings).